Enhancing Athletic Performance
With the recent highly publicized controversies regarding steroids and
other performance enhancing substances in Major League Baseball and
professional cycling, the use of performance enhancing substances has
become a hotly debated topic. This is a moral issue that is being
changed by advances in technology--as it becomes possible to do more
things technologically it becomes harder to control the use of
performance enhancing substances or even draw the line of what should
be prohibited. Where would you draw the line for professional
athletes? Should all performance enhancing substances be banned,
including natural ones? Should substances that have been cleared
by the FDA for medical use be allowed? Should there be a separate
category for athletes who don't use drugs, as there is for "natural" body
builders? Some argue testing is pointless since technology
will continuously develop new substances that will not be detected by
current tests. Some argue that we should have no testing and just
let technology run its course. What do you think? (Please consider this
topic only for professional athletes.)