Hahn 5

Power loom:

The myth of the inventor (pp. 165-167): to hide the labor politics people started telling a story that inventions caused the industrial revolution
Hahn summarizes her alternative view on p. 185 and 187 and it is also a focus of ch. 2 (contrast first and second paragraphs on p. 57)

Overview:

ch. 1
medieval to what was the system just before the IR?
putting out system
development of world trade and mercantile capitalism
ch. 2
late 1760s into the 1780s
the complexity of the invention and adoption of the machines for spinning
early development of factories: usually water powered so located in rural areas, employed women and children
in particular, factories hired children from the poorhouse (orphans and children whose parent couldn't afford to take care of them)
(single women in the US at Lowell but that is a side story)
changes in laws that made the factories possible--factory owners worked for those
ch. 3
particularly 1780s and 1790s
the better organization of the cotton industry centered around Manchester
expansion of spinning but weaving still done mostly in homes
where was cotton cloth made in the Manchester area sold and how was it transported?
ch. 4
after 1800
shift from water power to steam power
ch. 5
starting about 1830s--middle stages of the IR
power looms replace hand looms--advantages: fewer (skilled) workers, more uniform product
increasing corporate capitalism (corporations anyone can buy stock in and competition between corporations)
growing consumer culture--more moderate cost fancy goods, more people buying things according to fashion
imported goods were copied and the British-made copies out-competed the originals


Paper topic:
You pick a kind of history, such as women’s history, and examine how Hahn sees those causes and effects contributing to the industrial revolution and its effects on society.