chapter 14:
The Civil War was significantly impacted by
technology, particularly railroads and more accurate guns.
Maxim's invention of the first machine gun grew out of civil war
experiments. Yet
when World War I came the U.S. found itself behind in military
technology.
World War I started in 1914, US entered April 1917,
Armistice Dec. 1918.
- The war quickly settled down to a trench
warfare (photo)
stalemate due to the use of machine
guns and barbed wire--technology seemed to be the only way out.
- as well as airplanes and poison gas, tanks and
submarines were developed into useful weapons
- The war therefore led to the first major wartime
efforts to develop technology for military use
French tank
Poison gas
- A few months after the war began the French
apparently used gas against the Germans and the Germans
retaliated in kind.
- In the 9th month of the war the Germans released
a cloud of chlorine gas--which causes choking--on French troops who
retreated in panic, leaving behind perhaps 5,000 dead. A four
mile gap in the line was opened, but the Germans had not brought
forward enough reserves to exploit it and the Allies repaired the break.
- At first troops wore makeshift masks of
handkerchiefs wetted with urine and tied over nose and mouth.
- Germany was widely criticized for breaking the Hague
Conventions of 1899.
- In mid-1915 Germans started using phosgene, which
causes severe lung damage, and both sides developed gas masks.
- By the end of 1916 a variety of weapons were in
use by both sides. Germans introduced mustard gas--could cause
burns to exposed skin even when a soldier was protected by a mask.
- This quickly became a research race. It
started with the US
Bureau of Mines working on adapting mining equipment.
- A central lab was created in fall 1917 at
American University--at peak employed 1200 scientists. Developed
a new gas--Lewisite, that poisoned through the skin, simpler ways of
producing mustard gas, and more
- Chemical Warfare Service created July
1918--university chemists and Bureau of Mines personnel were given
commissions.
- In all as many as 50 different gases were
used--poison-gas causalities 1.3 million with 92,000 deaths.
- After the war chemists were proud of their
contribution to the nation--wanted ongoing research. Argued that
chemical weapons were humane (and effective) because they disabled
soldiers rather than killing them. They didn't get the continuing
high level of research they wanted.
- A strong reaction against the use of gas took
over instead. The Geneva Protocol--an international protocol
signed in 1925 prohibiting the use in war of "asphyxiating, poisonous
and other gasses" and of "bacteriological methods of warfare."
- The treaty held through World War II but use of poison gas
is a difficult issue today. Fear becomes an issue even when it is
not used: seven
Israelis suffocated to death due to improper use of gas masks during
Iraqi attacks in the Gulf War.
German signal corps
soldiers placing their carrier pigeons in a shelter during a gas attack
The airplane
had been invented in the U.S., but
the army had shown very little interest in its military potential.
- European countries had done much more, and in
1915 the U.S. realized it was behind and created an organization called
the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics to jump-start the
production of military aircraft.
- forced a patent pool--Manufacturers Aircraft
Association--to allow the best technologies to be used
- the Curtis Company designed a training plane, the
JN-4, but battle planes were built on a British design
- all of the countries involved struggled to figure
out how to make effective use of aircraft--new strategies had to be
developed by pilots
and integrated by generals
- mass production of aircraft was well underway in
the U.S. when the war ended--2091 planes had been shipped to France and
1041 were awaiting shipment
Curtis JN-4 Aircraft, World War I
The Navy also decided it needed to encourage research
- Thomas
Edison said he had a plan for preparedness but that he was
reluctant to discuss the terrible devices he had in mind. War
could be mechanized with labor-saving devices
- In 1915 the Navy established the Naval Consulting
Board
- the board was to consist of "Civilian Experts on
Machines" who would originate ideas and critically examine ideas
submitted by others--11 professional societies each named two
members. These were engineers and business leaders, not scientists
- the Board had a big fight about building its own
laboratory, but the laboratory that was eventually built continued
after the war as the Naval Research
Laboratory
- the effort that got the most public attention was
a plan to
screen inventions submitted by the public--Edison believed that
American inventors could win the war
- 110,000 inventions were submitted, 110 deemed
worthy of development, only one reached production--an aircraft
simulator invented by W. Guy Ruggles
- one of the Board's largest projects was trying to
find new methods of submarine detection
- they also sponsored research on gyroscopic
stabilization, leading to the first primitive autopilots for aircraft (Lawrence Sperry
proved they didn't work too well--at least not well enough for the
pilot to get romantic instead of flying the plane)
World War I British Submarine
Meanwhile scientists felt unappreciated and the
National Academy of Sciences (an honorary society created during the
Civil War) established the National Research Council in 1916 to show
what science could contribute
- Scientists wanted to show how valuable science
is: George Ellery Hale (an astronomer) wrote: "I really believe this is
the greatest chance we have ever had to advance research in America"
- they also focused on the problem of submarine
detection--German U-Boats sunk over a million tons of Allied and
neutral merchantment in the first quarter of 1917
- the NRC brought in professors from universities
to work on the problem
- a young mathematician named Max
Mason had the idea of a listening device
that could focus sound--he build something that looked like a trombone
- the final device had a range of 3 miles and was
very successful. Similar technology was developed for artillery
ranging
- scientists felt they had proved the scientific
research approach to developing new technology
Chapter 15:
The nice neat scientific world that had seemed possible in the
19th century was replace in the 20th with quantum mechanics,
relativity, and nuclear physics
- atoms no longer were nice neat little particles
- space and time were relative
- matter could be made into energy and one element could be
made into another--it was possible but not practical to make lead into
gold (the goal of medieval alchemists)
German scientists many of the key discoveries in
nuclear physics that made nuclear weapons possible, leading to fear in
the U.S.
that the Germans would build an atomic bomb.
Lise Meitner
- Otto
Hahn , Lise Meitner, and O.R. Frisch worked in the 1930s to
understand the results of bombarding uranium with neutrons--realized
that the uranium fissioned.
- by 1939 it was obvious and widely know that a
chain reaction might be possible because each atom that fissioned
released neutrons that could hit other atoms and cause them to fission
- Refugee scientists in the U.S. feared a German
bomb. Leo Szilard composed
two letters for Einstein to sign warning President Roosevelt of the
dangers of a German atomic bomb, one in August 1939 and the other
in April 1940. Fear was widespread enough that U.S. and British
journals volunarily censored related scientific papers.
- Germans were indeed working on a bomb, but got
stuck in a dead end. Supporters of Werner
Heisenberg say he did this on purpose.
Difficulties setting up such a big, uncertain research
and development project
- First organized under National Defense Research
Committee (approval for project Oct. 1941) then turned over to the army
in June 1942. The army put General Leslie Groves in
charge.
- The first thing to do was prove a chain reaction
was possible. That effort was led by Enrico
Fermi , first at Columbia then at the University of Chicago.
The first successful chain
reaction took place Dec. 2, 1942 in a small reactor built in a
squash court at the Univ. of Chicago.
- Providing fuel
for the bomb was a tremendous technical challenge--must separate
uranium-235, which is less than 1% of the uranium mined and differs in
weight by only .13%. Two methods of separation: a cyclotron and
gaseous diffusion of uranium hexaflouride (the only gaseous compound,
but one that is both poisonous and corrosive) were set up at Oak Ridge , Tenn.,
using TVA power. The other alternative is to make plutonium
by chain reactions--reactors to do this were built in Hanford,
Washington.
K-25
gaseous diffusion plant at Oak Ridge
- Robert
Oppenheimer led the effort to design the bomb and said he needed to
bring scientists together at a single laboratory. Los Alamos
opened in March 1943. Developed two bomb designs, one using
uranium and one using plutonium. The plutonium design was tested
in the Trinity
test near Alamogordo NM on July 16, 1945. Exploded with the force
of 20,000 tons of TNT.
Bombs
used in Japan
The decision to drop the bomb
( good links on the
decision
)
- Germany was clearly defeated and the Japanese
were retreating--was it necessary to use the bomb?
- Could there have been a demonstration and warning
instead? Would it have been used in Europe or was racism a factor?
- After spending $2 billion would the goverment
have been accused of wasting money if it wasn't used?
- when Roosevelt died on April 12, 1945, the bomb
project was so secret that Vice President Harry Truman didn't even know
about it. The bomb was used because having built it everyone
assumed that having built it they would use it.
- three B-29 bombers set out for Hiroshima , Japan on
Aug. 6, 1945. The Japanese sounded the all-clear when they saw
only 3 planes. The Enola Gay dropped the 5 ton bomb and it
exploded with the force of 15,000 tons of TNT. 130,000 people
died within 3 months, 68% of the buildings of the city were destroyed.
- A plutonium bomb was dropped on Nagasaki
on Aug. 9, 1945. Exploded with the force of 22,000 tons of TNT.
bomb
damage in Hiroshima
The scientists tried to prevent an arms race
from developing. Why did they feel so strongly, and did they have
any hope of success?
People were frightened by
the bomb and began to question the idea that technological progress was
always good
- the cold war meant real fears that a nuclear war would start
- Hiroshima made vivid the dangers of radioactivity, leading
to movies about mutant monsters
- young people in the 1960s began to reject the boring lives
their parents had wanted after WWII
- Rachel Carson published Silent Spring in 1960, and public
concern about environmental issues grew rapidly
- the Civil Rights Movement was showing the American people
that you can change the wrongs of society
- Sputnik (the first artificial satellite) and computers
started a new technological age
If it was possible for human beings to fly, then why
not fly to the moon? (a
brief history of rockets)
- Jules Verne's novel From the Earth to the Moon
(1865), featuring a launch from a cannon in northeastern Florida
- Konstantin Tsiolkovsky's work (influenced by
Verne) in Russia on the theory of rocket propulsion?
- in 1903 he published a book titled Exploring
Cosmic Space with Reactive Devices in which he laid out the
mathematics of orbital mechanics and designed a rocket powered by
liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen.
- Recognized many of the
problems, eg. burning up during reentry, and thought of multistage
rockets (which he called rocket trains).
- No attempt to
experiment--he received only one small grant.
- Saw spaceflight as
liberation from human limits and the first step towards the perfection
of human society.
- Robert Goddard's theories (1919 treatise A
Method of Reaching Extremely High Altitudes), and experiments,
starting in 1926, with small, liquid-fuel rockets
- In 1930 Goddard set up full time resarch in
New Mexico, attempting 41 launches, 31 of them successful, in the next
11 years. His largest rocket was 22 feet in length, fuilded with
gasoline and liquid oxygen. After 1941 he couldn't get further
support, and he died in 1945.
- He was much laughed at and couldn't take it,
so he conducted his research privately, failed to build an
organization, suffered from lack of support, and had little
influence. He repeatedly failed to get military funding (on the
grounds that the U.S. had no need for military rockets at that time),
and while he received over $200,000 from foundations, it was on a year
by year basis that made it difficult to undertake large projects.
His fame came only when space travel began to look realistic--in 1960
the U.S. government awarded his family $1 million for the rights to use
more than 200 of his patents.
The key to turning this enthusiasm into a serious space
program turned out to be government support, and the Germans were the
first to get it.
- the roots of this development are in an society
of amateur rocketers inspired by a German-speaking Rumanian
schoolteacher and rocket theoretician, Hermann Oberth, who published
The Rocket into Planetary Space in 1923
- The Society for Space Travel (VfR) was founded in
1927, with Oberth as its president
Society for Space Travel
- by 1929 it had 870 members, including Wernher von
Braun, who had just graduated from high school.
- It had two goals: popularize the idea of flight
to the moon and planets and perform serious experiments in rocket
propulsion.
- Oberth was a classic incompetent theoretician
(one of his colleagues said that if "Oberth wants to drill a hole,
first he invents the drill press"), early efforts resulted in many
explosions inclusing one that killed a member, Despite these problems,
the society successfully launched 87 small liquid-fueled rockets in
1931 from an abandoned WWI ammunition storage facility (including one
that set fire to a nearby police station). Experiments continued
at a slowing rate until 1934, when the society went bankrupt
- Amateur research could only afford to go so
far--the VfR was funding only by dues and admission charged to view
launches. The leaders of the VfR promoted the idea of rockets as
weapons in hopes of getting the funding they needed.
- The German army became interested in rockets in
1929 as a way of getting around the treaty of Versailles limits on the
army
- In 1932 the German army assigned Walter
Dornberger to look into liquid-fueled rockets, and he hired von Braun
and a number of amateurs--but clearly to develop a weapon, not space
travel
- This led to the building of the V-2
intermediate range ballistic missile, used against England.
- When the war was over von Braun arranged to to
captured by the U.S. not the Soviet Union and said he wasn't a Nazi, he
was only interested in space travel.
captured
V-2 being prepared for launch
U.S. military interest was at first spotty.
- U.S. cold war strategy was based on bombers
carrying nuclear weapons. For one thing, it was cheap, and Truman
and Eisenhower both were reluctant to increase the size of the
government and distort the economy by large-scale defense
spending. Substituting technological superiority for a large
standing army put a new weight on being ahead
- Project RAND
(an Air Force think tank) produced in May 1946 a report: "Preliminary
Design of an Experimental World-Circling Spaceship" mentioned
reconnaissance, weather, and communications
- In 1951 RAND scientists visiting Wright
Field heard a briefing by James Lipp of Boston University's Physical
Research Laboratory about using television for satellite
reconnaissance. The key RAND reconnaissance people though the
idea was ridiculous, and set out to disprove it with pictures taken at
30,000 feet with 8mm movie camera lenses mounted to a 35mm Leica camera
loaded with coarse grain film and processed for poor resolution.
The pictures showed streets and bridges, convincing Amrom Katz and
others that satellite reconnaissance was feasible.
- the army had von Braun working on medium range
ballistic missiles, the Air Force was working on the Atlas
intercontinental ballistic missile, and the Navy's Naval Research Lab
was doing a wide range of scientific research on rockets--but none of
these had high priority or crash project funding
- Korean war led to more funding for
intercontinental ballistic missiles in 1951--Atlas--but with funding
only for a slow development process (at Convair--even in FY 1954 Atlas
got only $14 million). Only in 1954 was the decision make to give
it high priority
Atlas
ICBM
Reconnaissance was a big need:
- What created stronger interest in the Department
of Defense was not only fears of intercontinental ballistic missiles
but the lure of spy satellites.
- Balloon reconnaissance over the Soviet Union
began in 1956--243 balloons were never heard from again and only 44
were successfully recovered (the Soviets put some on display in Moscow
and showed pictures of an air base in Turkey they said they had found
on the film carried by one of the balloons)
- The U-2 was
approved in 1954, designed by Kelly Johnson and the Lockheed Skunk
Works in 80 days, and first used in 1956.
U-2
- One of the key problems for an open state
competing with a closed one was information. You could do it with
aircraft--U-2, but only at substantial risk--a U-2 was shot down over
the Soviet Union in 1960, creating a major diplomatic
incident. This proved to be how rockets and particularly
launching satellites finally got substantial support
With all the rocket building, satellites were so
clearly in the works that they were made part of the plans for the
International Geophysical Year, a cooperative research effort in
1957-1958
- But this raised an interesting dilemma--it wasn't
a race for a spy satellite but an idea for something the Soviets didn't
need and wouldn't like
- Eisenhower insisted that the project be peaceful
rather than military. For one thing, this reflected his attempt
to avoid a military-dominated state.
- this may also have been a strategy to establish
the legitimacy of satellite overflight. Where do air rights
end?--how to establish open skies in international law
- one way to do it is to launch a scientific
satellite, preferably under international auspices (IGY). Far
better that this be launched by the Navy's rocket built for scientific
research than by what would clearly be a ballistic missile (then it
would just look like a military test)
- or, you can let the Soviet Union launch first and
not complain when their satellite goes over the U.S.--then they can
hardly complain when a U.S. satellites goes over them
- The Naval Research Lab's Vanguard
program was chosen for the first launch in a close vote by a panel of
experts (on the basis of a better satellite) to launch the first
satellite instead of von Braun's Redstone/Jupiter (which could have
reached orbit in a test flight in Sept. 1956 if it had had a live upper
stage). This was probably not a political decision, but it was on
the basis on science, not a race with the Russians
- What is clearly political is that the DoD and
Eisenhower went along with that choice, knowing that it almost surely
meant that the USSR would launch first
- And they did, launching Sputnik 1 on October 4,
1957
Sputnik
1
- This lead to a large public furor and the
creation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Enough work had been done on a project called
Man-in-Space-Soonest by the founding of NASA (Oct. 1, 1958) so
that a consensus had been reached:
- goal: to orbit and recover a manned satellite at
the earliest practical date and to investigate the capabilities
of man in this environment
- configuration: a ballistic capsule with high
aerodynamic drag to be landed with parachutes
- the Atlas ICBM was the most reliable available
booster system (although not tested successfully until Nov.
1958), but expensive ($2.5 million each) and not yet available, so
testing was done with a cluster of solid rockets called little Joe and
with Redstone
- In Dec. 1958 Eisenhower decided to draw
astronaut candidates only from the pool of military test pilots (for
security reasons, for one thing). The education requirement was
reduced to bachelors degree or equivalent and test pilot school.
- Testing of astronaut candidates started in early
1959 from a pool of 110 qualified pilots. 32 were selected on the
basis of written and psychological tests for physical testing.
This testing followed a pattern set up for the Manhigh research balloon
program--very detailed medical testing to ensure good health and
establish a baseline and environmental tests. 18 of the 31
were recommended without medical reservations. They went into a
program of training and participation in system design
- the first unmanned test of the Mercury capsule
with the Atlas booster was held July 29, 1960. One minute
after lift-off telemetry showed a complete loss of pressure in fuel
tanks, then telemetry was lost. The booster was in the clouds at
the time, but apparently it either exploded or suffered catastrophic
structural failure.
- In Sept. 1960 an Atlas-Able carrying an early
moon probe also failed severely, raising questions about the use
of Atlas for Mercury which were particularly severe because of the
pressures of an election year.
- There was a lot of press criticism that Mercury
was not a crash program, but rather took things one step at a
time with attention to budget and took second priority to the ICBM
program.
- the first test of the Mercury-Redstone
combination to be used to launch a person into ballistic flight
was conducted on Nov. 21, 1960. The booster lifted 4 inches off
the launch pad and then settled back down. The escape tower
activated and took off, without the capsule, landing near the launch
site and the capsule, still sitting on the booster, shot out its
parachutes. Disarming the booster was not easy, but at least it
was available for study to determine the cause of failure (a plug which
disconnected unevenly, sending an abort signal).
Mercury-Redstone
1
- on Dec. 19, 1960 a successful test of
Mercury-Redstone was finally completed.
- the question of whether a human being could
survive in space became unnecessary on April 12, 1961, when the
Soviet Union launched Yuri Gagarin into orbit in a capsule weighing 3
times what Mercury weighed. No news of the flight was released
until after recovery.
- on May 5, 1961, Alan B. Shepard, Jr., rode a
Mercury-Redstone in a ballistic orbit into space on live TV
- safety of the Altas was such a concern that a
chimpanzee named Enos was launched on Mercury Atlas 5 on Nov. 28,
1961. The machine to test his abilities under stress--pulling
levers to receive a reward or avoid punishment--malfunctioned and he
received shocks even when correct. He performed, but arrived on
the ship hopping mad.
- after a series of delays John Glenn was finally
orbited on Feb. 20, 1962, Scott Carpenter on May 24, 1962, Walter
Schirra on Oct. 3, 1962, and Gordon Cooper on May 15, 1963
(observations of the earth).
Once you have put people in space, what do you do with
them?
- The Dec. 1960 PSAC Report had projected a manned
circumlunar flight about 1970, and a manned landing on the moon about
1975 at a total cost of $26 to 38 billion.
NASA included only circumlunar flight in its ten
year plan, yet as early as mid-1959 NASA had identified a manned trip
to the moon as a logical next step after putting people in space and
had started the necessary planning.
- Eisenhower refused to include money for Apollo
development in his 1962 budget, while at the same time he approved
development of an anti-satellite satellite
Meanwhile, Kennedy was elected in November 1960,
having made a big fuss in his campaign about the missile gap (which did
not in fact exist)
- the first signs from the Kennedy administration
were negative on space in general--NASA worried he would support the
Air Force which wanted NASA to be replace by a military space program
- Kennedy's vice president, Johnson, had long been
a major supporter of the space program
- Not until Jan 30 did Kennedy appoint a new NASA
administrator, James Webb, who took office Feb. 14. But Webb was
clearly an ambitious man
the key shift, however, came in Kennedy's political
situation
- April 12, 1961, Soviet Union launched Gagarin,
and the U.S. was again embarrassingly behind
- at an April 14 meeting it became clear that
Kennedy wanted to accept the Soviet challenge, but was worried by the
cost
on April 17 a group of anti-Castro Cuban exiles,
trained and financed by the U.S. invaded
Cuba in what came to be called the Bay of Pigs fiasco because it
was a total failure.
- on April 19 Kennedy asked Johnson to find a
"space program which promises dramatic results in which we could
win. Johnson and the Space Council organized hearings to answer
this question. concluded that there was no chance of beating the
Russians in putting a multi-manned laboratory in space
- NASA said we could beat the Russians to the moon,
and set 1967 as a target date. Accelerating the program would
raise the cost from $22.3 billion to $33.7 billion
- Meanwhile, on May 5, 1961, Alan B. Shepard, Jr.,
rode a Mercury-Redstone in a ballistic tragectory into space, with live
TV coverage. This was a reminder of what good press came from
putting people in space
- Webb and Secretary of Defense MacNamara, with
Johnson's blessing, wrote a memo entitled "Recommendations for our
National Space Program: Changes, Policies, Goals." Called for a
manned lunar landing before 1970, emphasizing national prestige and
international competition
- Kennedy approved this as it stood--proposed a 61%
increase in 1962 NASA budget
- On May 25, in a speech
(listen
to it all) entitled "Urgent National Needs"
Kennedy said: "I believe that this Nation should commit itself to
achieving the goal,before this decade is out, of landing a man on the
moon and returning him safely to earth."
- the key point is that Apollo was a crash
program--faster than even NASA had planned. The essential
definition of a crash program is that different approaches are worked
on in parallel
The space program turned out in some ways to be a dead end
continuation of "modern," while the computer has taken us in very
different directions
chapter 16:
Lessons Learned from WWII
- Basic science=power
- we can develop new technologies quickly to do whatever we
want
- technology gives us dangerous power
- some policy issues require technical knowledge in order to
understand the issue
Vannevar Bush
- wrote a prediction
of the future in 1945--quite accurate except he missed completely
the digital computer (much of his engineering research had been on
analog computers)
- wrote a report later published as a book called: Science: The
Endless Frontier
- his belief that the federal government should pay for basic
scientific research led to the National Science Foundation
- he was critical of the manned space program on the grounds
that it was too dangerous
- he understood that managing information was becoming a key
problem
What does Lienhard predict for the future?
- renewed enthusiasm for progress
- accepting that the world is full of mystery instead of
expecting to be able to control it all
- we will live in an "expanded" era