Hamblin 2
problems with using human/animal/plant
diseases as a weapon?
- how
to control the spread of the disease to not affect
your own people
- how
destructive is it going to be in your future
interests to be
- total
war: not just the battlefield but also industrial
productivity,
- it
is going to take a lot of expensive research to
develop and produce
- what is the best use of the military
budget
- how important is military
capacity--in cold war very important so Congress
was willing to fund it
- chemical,
biological or nuclear--which do you prioritize?
- goal
of biological weapons against crops was to harm
the economy--the target is civilians
- most
specifically targeted--this was an advantage to
military planners
the military was doing research particularly on plant
and animal diseases
-
also trying to figure out how to integrate
biological weapons into war plans
-
the policy of "retaliation only" (no first use)
was debated but kept
-
but biological weapons were seen as necessary for
a future total war
research into how to spread plant diseases, for
example using birds or bird feathers
leaflet bomb that could be used for bird feathers
it takes scientific study to figure out how to spread
disease effectively
evaluating agents of human disease
- how
rapidly would they incapacitate people--for
soldiers you want an effect within 24 hours
- how
many people would be incapacitated per pound of
material
- how
expensive would it be to produce
- how
long would people be incapacitated
- would
the epidemic spread beyond the target area
specific context of the Korean war
- racist attitudes
- limited war within the cold war
context
idea to spread radioactive waste
between North and South Korea
- but disease would not be immediate
- commanders might not care that their
soldiers were being exposed to disease-causing levels of
radiation
Was biological warfare used in the
Korean War?
- the diseases and the conditions for
their spread were already present
- the US was accused of dropping
insects to spread disease, which didn't make much sense in
winter
- many different diseases were
spreading, while a military effort would be more focused
- a few prominent European scientists
were convinced by Chinese and Korean evidence
- clearly the Soviets and Chinese
mounted a major propaganda campaign to accuse the US of
using biological weapons
- Hamblin concludes the evidence of US
use was very weak
- the controversy got a lot of
attention because it could be done (even though it wasn't
in this case)
How could people think these things?
- the cold war really did feel like a
clash of civilizations
- and that total war was close
Duck
and cover