Farber 3
the kind of evidence that scientists aren't seeing: Edward
Bouchet (and more
on his career)
Where does the variation we see in human beings come from
genetics:
- skin color
- face shape and
hair texture
- variability in height, ratio between fast twitch and
slow twitch muscles
- but things can be genetic without actually being
real differences because the variability is much greater
than the difference
environment: (first level; variation caused
by the environment is not passed on to offspring)
- average height is mostly the result of nutrition
- education determines performance on most
tests, even IQ tests
- epigenetics--environment of the parents
can affect the offspring because genes turn on and off
culture:
- values
- different musical talents
humans make sense of the world by putting things into
categories
we think those categories are realer than they are
How scientists moved away
from scientific racism:
Franz
Boas had experienced anti-Semitism in Germany and was
committed to fighting racial prejudice
- argued against the idea of racial
purity, mostly looking at European groups who were
discriminated against
- argued for the importance of environment
over heredity
- 1906 commencement
address at Atlanta University (now Clark Atlanta
University)
- argues for example that Africans were
the first to smelt
iron
- in 1931 he argued there was no evidence
that mulattoes showed any genetic ill effects
- p. 46 quoting Boas: "There is no reason
to believe that one race is by nature so much more
intelligent, endowed with great
will power, or
emotionally more stable than another, that the
difference would materially influence its culture."
- his anthropological ideas were so
influential that his follows became known as a school
(not an actual institution, but they were identified as
a distinct approach)
Other anthropologists continued the work
- Melville
Herskovitz showed in the late 1920s that almost 80% of
African Americans were the product of race mixing.
- Modern figures show that the average
African-American today has 24% European ancestry.
- a
study showed that 5% of white South Carolinians had
at least 2% African ancestry and 12% have at least 1% (an
African ancestor no further back than 7 generations)
- they actually had less variability than those of
only African descent, which showed that the homogeneity of
pure groups was a myth
- average differences aren't very meaningful if
individual variation is much larger
- argued that race had no biological meaning for
humans
- a classification of human beings, but based on a
mixture of characteristics that doesn't make much
scientific sense
- you can't classify human beings into races that
match at all our social categories by genetics alone
- Otto
Klineberg showed that there was no evidence for racial
differences in intelligence and argued that there was no
reason to prohibit race mixing
- Ashley
Montagu argued for race and gender equality in the
1950s, pointing out that races are not fixed entities with
fixed characteristics
- statistics show races differ on average, but that
is just the average of varied and shifting populations
- suggested using the term ethnic group instead of
race
- pointed out that biologists knew outbreeding
produced better offspring in plants and animals but due to
prejudice refused to apply that to humans
- noted in 1942 in Man's Most Dangerous Myth
that anti-miscegenation laws violated the constitution
Why did the Nazi campaign against the Jews and others
seen as inferior end talk about eugenics?
- after all, the US was putting Japanese people in
camps
- but the Nazi level of prejudice against people who
were white was shocking
- killing people because they were undesirable crossed
a line, and the arguments used against that could be used
against other eugenic programs as well
In a UNESCO
statement in 1950 first social scientists and then physical
anthropologists and geneticists backed the statement that
races had long been mixed and race mixing had no
harmful consequences
What effect did this have? Consider chapter 1.