Farber 6
The attitudes of college students were changing
- colleges shouldn't police our morals
(when we are old enough to die in Vietnam)
- if discrimination is wrong in the south
it is wrong in the north too
Mainline churches supported interracial marriage
- religion had been used against interracial marriage
but the passages used pretty clearly prohibit marriage with
people of a different religion, not people of a different
race, and Moses was married to an Ethiopian (Cush in Numbers
12:1 is identified as Ethiopia, though some interpreters
have a theory there were two different lands of Cush)
- Bob Jones University banned interracial dating until
2000
- more
on religious views
Do universities indoctrinate liberal views?
- note that according to Crowdpac.com,
Clemson is the 364th most liberal university out of 446
based on political donations of people who work there
- some university administrators were hands off the
issue, others were caught meeting the expectations of
parents (protecting their daughters) as students
expectations were changing
- students learned in anthropology and genetics
courses that race was not a biological concept
- to what extent does social change start with young
adults?
- on average young people change their views more
easily than older people
- in some eras young people rebel against
traditional ideas
- when does teaching new science cross over to
indoctrinating liberal views?
- one idea of the role of the university is to teach
students to think critically, to question assumptions and
come to their own opinions (not just learning facts or
training for a career)
History of in loco parentis
- the idea was that colleges were in a
parental role, responsible for providing students with a
safe environment and guiding the development of their
character
- this involved such rules as curfews but
also restrictions on speech and rules about where you
could go (even which restaurants). Colleges were
expected to make rules for students and discipline them
the way parents would
- in 1961 the dean of women at Syracuse
University believed it was her job to monitor the dating
practices of female students, including informing
parents if a woman dated someone of a different race
more than once (p. 84)
- Dixon v. Alabama (1961): Alabama State
College expelled a group of African-American students
for participating in a civil rights demonstration
- Circuit Court ruled that students have a
right to due process: a hearing before they are expelled
- Hammond v. South Carolina State College
(1967) students who violated a rule against campus
demonstrations without advance permission from college
authorities won their case in court on the grounds of
their right to free speech
- students at private universities had
fewer rights because their enrollment was seen as an
agreement to the rules of the university
- 1971 26th amendment lowered the voting
age from 21 to 18: now college students were legally
adults
- colleges changed to having a Dean of
Students position instead of separate Deans of Women and
Men
- debate continued about whether colleges
were responsible for harm to students from their own bad
choices or the behavior of other students
- by the 1980s it was clear that colleges
had a responsibility to provide a safe environment on
campus even though they did not have the right to police
the morality of students
- today universities are seen as having a
responsibility to facilitate student growth even though
they don't have a legal responsibility to care for
students
- students are adults responsible for
their own choices
University of Pittsburgh did seek to interfere with
interracial couples
In the case of the handicapped couple
- the dean of women tried to break
them up
- faculty stood up for them
- they eventually married and had two children
- they had trouble renting an apartment, eventually
bought a house in a Jewish neighborhood
housing discrimination was a big problem--first
prohibited by the Fair Housing Act of 1968, but it was much
ignored by landlords who had stereotypes about who would be
good tenants or feared that other tenants would avoid
apartments in integrated complexes
Civil Rights Act 1964
social barriers kept race mixing low