Saini ch. 9
India is divided up into quite separate communities: Castes
- very strong cultural presumption that who your
parents are determines your life, you are born a certain way
- the base of this is religion, not biology
- this worked culturally because it reduced
competition
- one of the strongest examples of people still
believing that groups should be kept separate
- so a natural experiment in breeding groups
with distinct skills
- but that assumes genetics determines
everything
Is intelligence heritable?
- would you see differences based on genes if
people were raised identically?
- but they aren't--eg. a black child adopted by
a white family experiences racism in school
- North Koreans are shorter even though height
is quite heritable because they don't get enough nutrition
growing up
- if intelligence is genetic it is controlled by
thousands of genes each of which may be more or less common in
different populations, and we don't know the mechanism by
which they act
- for disadvantaged people, research shows
environment causes virtually all the variation in intelligence
- for very advantaged people who have
ideal environments, there may be genetic differences
- but IQ itself is not fixed in an individual or
over time
- improvements in research have tended to reduce
the percentage of intelligence that is genetic
So what do we learn from the natural experiment in
India
- small groups who only marry each other have
led to high rates of some genetic illnesses in some groups
- culture is so tight that characteristics seem
genetic when they are not
- culture strengthens itself by metaphors that
you are born that way
- a large study of affirmative action in India
found no differences in performance in those hired in
a quota (they were hired because they were a member of a
disadvantaged caste even though their test scores were
slightly lower)