Weart preface and ch. 1
How do scientists reach reliable conclusions? (p.
viii)
- about something as impossibly complicated as
climate
- that involves scientists from very different
disciplines
how do they interact with policy?
Guy Stewart Callendar
- he gathered more global data than anyone had
before (as a hobby)
- he was a steam engineer and blamed carbon
dioxide from burning coal
that the atmosphere keeps in heat with carbon
dioxide playing the key role had been shown in the 19th century
- water vapor also holds in heat, which means if
the earth gets warmer more heat will be held in, while if it
gets cooler more heat will escape--instead of returning to
balance any fluctuation is reinforced
- carbon dioxide levels can give that a push
- Svante Arrhenius had argued for carbon dioxide
regulation temperature in 1896
- but scientists thought they had disproved
it--excess would just be absorbed by the oceans
Scientists at the time tended to see nature as
stable
- at the time, scientists believed in the
balance of nature and assumed that humans could not possibly
upset that
- Very important:
scientists no longer believe that nature is inherently
stable
- climate was the average of weather and by
definition assumed to stay the same
- the interesting question was what caused the
ice ages
- one theory that the sunspot cycle causes
climate variation didn't test out
- scientists say the world keeps changing, it
doesn't stay the same