Mokyr 2-4
video of
Mokyr
the middle ages saw more technological creativity than the
ancient world
more important, technology was larger driver of economic
growth
technology still diffused slowly, particularly agriculture
which is so dependent on local conditions
what characteristics of a society spur technological
progress/economic growth? and which hinder?
- what spurs new technological ideas?
- openness to new ideas
- knowledge, whether from experience or
education
- capital to build the new thing
- willingness to take risks on something new
- what do you need to translate technology into
economic growth?
- interest in more efficient ways of doing
practical work
- rewards, probably from capitalism making it
possible to make money on something new
- belief that progress is possible
What is new in Mokyr's discussion of the middle
ages (notice the choices historians make):
- the horse as an improvement in
transportation, allowing more trade
- the chimney was only invented in the 12th
century (before that houses had hearths but only a hole in
the roof for the smoke to escape)
- emphasis that inventions came from ordinary
people (workers, not scientists)
the Islamic world was most advanced in the early middle ages
- very good at finding ideas and putting them into use
- perhaps less good at coming up with new ideas
- why? will be discussed later
p. 55: "It may be true, as Alfred North Whitehead has
stated, that as far as science is concerned, Europe still knew
less in 1500 than Archimedes knew in 212 B.C. As far as
technology is concerned, this assessment is definitely false."
What specifically was the character of technological
creativity in medieval Europe?
Mokyr sees the renaissance as a time of less
impressive technological change of economic importance (see the
paragraph at the bottom of 57 and top of 58)
- mostly microinventions, small steady changes rather than
radical new ideas
- agricultural practices were changing again (the changes
that eventually led up to the industrial revolution)
- books began to be written about technology so knowledge
could be shared more widely
- but skilled workers were still the key problem in
adopting new technology
What slowed things down
- some reaction against change
- new industries grew up in rural areas (for example
through the putting out system) because of restrictions in
cities
- to what extent did religious leaders try to slow down
science and technology
- they wanted to maintain traditional authority
- authority of the king, of traditional learning (Bible,
Aristotle), traditional ways of doing things
- fear that new ideas will upend all that
The age of exploration brought new plants and products
- corn and potatoes provided lower cost food
- pottery
and cloth industries developed new products to compete with
imported goods
- industrial fishing provided cheaper protein
Scientific Revolution ( a
somewhat more detailed overview ):
- Copernicus
published De Revolutionibus Orbis Celestium in
1543. He was a priest motivated by the need for calendar
reform, but his argument that the earth goes around the sun
(instead of vice
versa) started the downfall of Aristotelian science
- Kepler
published the theory that the planets move in elliptical
orbits in 1609.
- Galileo
published his defense of the Copernican system in 1632 and his
new physics in 1638. He did see science as practical;
his physics treated force as a universal concept that could be
used to understand all machines. Galileo is most important
because he put into place a new scientific method in which
scientists argued from experiment and from his observations
with the telescope, not from logic alone.
- Newton
published the law of universal gravitation in 1687. He
was slowed down a bit because he had to invent calculus in
order to show that his theory worked.
the
telescope