Nye 5
Myth vs. reality:
- myth: water powered mills combined with lots
of technological creativity were the key to the
establishment and growth of towns. This allowed
American industry to be very different from in
Britain.
- counternarrative: yeoman farmer--Democracy
will only work if the US is a nation of farmers
- reality: water power was important to the
settling of towns, made possible by state government
interference. Mill towns didn't stay that different
from British conditions very long
water power was widely used before the industrial revolution
saw mills
and grain grinding mills
in the 18th and early 19th century the foundation story of
settlement started with a mill
- mills were so important to the community that state
governments used eminent domain for millers who needed more
land or would destroy land upstream by flooding (p. 97)
- when large textile mills were built starting in the 1830s
they benefited from this special legal protection
- the foundation story became the coming not just of a
community of farmers but of industry, in the eyes of those who
were pro-manufacturing
The argument against manufacturing was particularly strong in
the south
- large factories as in England (industrial revolution
started 1780s) were seen as bad for democracy
- an illustrated survey of the coming of
textile mills to America: http://pammack.sites.clemson.edu/lec323/kids-amir.html
- but the south had lots of small mills--sawing, grinding
grain, polishing rice...
- why was it harder to build large mills in the south?
- what is your labor force? plantation owners did
not want their slaves to work in mills--too many together to
think about rebellion and too dangerous
- lack of good sites near the coast
- you could make more profit from other investments
- textile mills were built in the south in the mid 19th
century: William Gregg built a mill in Graniteville
and promoted milling in the south
the foundation story that revolved around mills was one of
progress and ingenuity
- the machine in the garden--scattered industry very
different from the dirty, crowded
industrial cities in Britain
- partnership with nature
- business not held back by restrictive rules (that myth is
still powerful)
- actually most mills were state-supported monopolies