Altman sections 2 and 3
what can you take from all these details of messy politics
- we never come up with the best plan, new policies
grow step by step
- people create changes by lots of different
routes--there are many ways to get things done
Hill-Burton bill to fund hospital construction included a
requirement that those hospitals provide care to people who
could not afford to pay
- the government did not define or enforce that part
of the law for 24 years
- until a young lawyer started winning lawsuits in
1970
- the courts put requirements on hospitals to provide
free care and inform patients, but the decision that said
individuals had a right to care was reversed on appeal
- the Department of Health, Education and Welfare
(HEW) issued regulations in 1979 requiring hospitals to
provide a minimum amount of care to those who could not pay
Medicare:
- only 38% of the elderly had any health insurance in
1958
- hospitals wanted help with the burden of caring for
people without insurance
- Kerr-Mills bill in 1960 provided federal matching
funds for state that developed their own program, but few
did so effectively
- when it became inevitable the Republicans,
particularly Wilbur Mills, combined three rival bills into
one that would be hard for the supporters of any of the
three to oppose, which became law in 1965
Philosophical questions:
- should your insurance cost depend on your
health? Your income? Your habits?
- what is the proper role of the federal government?
- should the system be financed by premiums or taxes
- should a government program (state or federal) apply
only to the poor?
- Are we willing to support a system where many people
pay for more than they get?
How to increase coverage without increasing taxes:
- 1988 expansion covering catastrophic coverage and
medications introduced different rates depending on income
to pay for more of the costs via premiums was passed and
then repealed
- cover children only, with funding from an increased
cigarette tax--SCHIP in 1997
- one proposal was to change Medicare to a premium
support program--you get a fixed amount of money to buy your
own insurance
Prescription benefit
- 1998-2002 drug costs increased 13% a year--what
wasn't a problem in the 1960s became a large problems in
2000s
- 2003 MMA encouraged private options within Medicare
but cost a lot of tax money
Controlling costs
- why do costs rise so fast?
- DRG system of fixed payments by diagnosis
- cost-effectiveness analysis is used in some
countries but would not be accepted in the US
- comparative effectiveness research has more
potential
- why are US costs higher?
- US doctors earn higher salaries, cost
of medical education is very high
- doctors use more expensive procedures
- drugs and devices cost more
- administrative costs
Why has the cost of health care increased so much in
the last 50 years?
- improved technology
- companies are inventing machines to do more
accurate treatment because they can make money selling the
machines
- people don't put in the effort--some insurance plans
now reward better behavior
- why does it cost $140 to go to the doctor for a
quick problems, not $40
- cost of buildings and maintenance
- expensive technology
- managing billing and insurance is very expensive
- do extra tests, sometimes to make more money,
sometimes because they might get sued if they don't,
sometimes because it is most efficient to do it all at
once
- people are unhealthier because they live longer
- more treatments, people live with chronic diseases
instead of dying of them
- pharmaceutical companies keep inventing drugs that
are a little bit better and a lot more expensive
- research is very expensive because of government
regulation
- advertising increases the cost and use of
expensive medications
- lack of preventative care
- more solutions to problems that people used to live
with (companies know this is a way to make money)