The myth of the inventor (pp. 165-167): to hide
the labor politics people started telling a story that
inventions caused the industrial revolution
Hahn summarizes her alternative view on p. 185 and 187 and it is
also a focus of ch. 2 (contrast first and second paragraphs on
p. 57)
Overview:
ch. 1 |
medieval to what was the system just before
the IR? |
putting out system development of world trade and mercantile capitalism |
ch. 2 |
late 1760s into the 1780s |
the complexity of the invention and adoption
of the machines for spinning early development of factories: usually water powered so located in rural areas, employed women and children in particular, factories hired children from the poorhouse (orphans and children whose parent couldn't afford to take care of them) (single women in the US at Lowell but that is a side story) changes in laws that made the factories possible--factory owners worked for those |
ch. 3 |
particularly 1780s and 1790s |
the better organization of the cotton
industry centered around Manchester expansion of spinning but weaving still done mostly in homes where was cotton cloth made in the Manchester area sold and how was it transported? |
ch. 4 |
after 1800 |
shift from water power to steam power |
ch. 5 |
starting about 1830s--middle stages of the IR |
power looms replace hand looms--advantages:
fewer (skilled) workers, more uniform product increasing corporate capitalism (corporations anyone can buy stock in and competition between corporations) growing consumer culture--more moderate cost fancy goods, more people buying things according to fashion imported goods were copied and the British-made copies out-competed the originals |
Paper topic:
You pick a kind of history, such as women’s history, and examine
how Hahn sees those causes and effects contributing to the
industrial revolution and its effects on society.