Critical Thinking:
Causes of the industrial revolution
what is the best way to ask a question that gets at
specifics?
is the question what got the IR started or what allowed
it to keep going?
or why did the industrial revolution happen first in
England?
why did it happen at this particular time?
there are many necessary conditions, but what was the key
that set the industrial revolution going in a
particular time and place?
what allowed it to keep going, not run out of energy
sources?
Hobsbawm uses logic to evaluate possible causes
Possible
causes:
economy becoming more capitalist (free
market)
feudalism was almost gone--farmers were no
longer bound to the land
decline of guild
system--the guild for a particular trade could no
longer control who set up a new business
decline of the system of customary
prices--the market is more free, instead of the old system
where changing the price because of a shortage was seen as
profiteering
these changes were a necessary condition but
not perhaps the immediate cause
enclosure
=the abolishment of the old system of
communal farming and its replacement with family
farms. Supposedly everyone had the same share of land
as before, but the smallest farmers didn't have enough to
survive as an independent farm and they went out of business
and went looking for work. Took place 16th century to
about 1820.
four
field crop rotation replaced the medieval
three field system--wheat, turnips,
barley, clover or alfalfa (turnips and hay crops make it
possible to keep more livestock over the winter)
new scientific approaches to farming (one
of the pioneer scientific investigators of agriculture was
an Englishman named Jethro
Tull)
average agricultural surplus per worker
doubled from about 25% to about 50%
workers no longer needed in agriculture
were available for industrial jobs (details on this
argument)
increasing population--but it didn't really
start increasing until the industrial revolution began
England had lots of coal, so as population and industry
grew it didn't run out of energy
England was a Protestant country and the protestant
work ethic benefited the economy (this idea was put
forth by a sociologist named Max Weber in a book titled The Protestant Ethic and the
Spirit of Capitalism
Many scientists and inventors were members of religious
minorities
most professions were closed to them because
in England you had to belong to the Church of England in
order to be a lawyer or
hold a government job, other kinds of protestants, called
dissenters, were not allowed to hold such positions or even
to go to the best universities
in England the dissenters also became the leaders of
the industrial revolution
France was Catholic--for a while it tolerated a
protestant minority called the Huguenots, but then they were
told they would have to convert or leave the country because
the king feared they were disloyal
but Hobsbawm points out that other Protestant countries
did not industrialize rapidly
a domestic market with manufacturing already
established--transportation was relatively cheap
consumer culture, people who could afford to buy things
followed by the growing market provided by the British
Empire
exploration led to increased trade meant
cash crops and regional specialization
Europeans traded for exotic products
(spices, silk, etc.) with Asians
How to make money from the New World?
Europeans had to invent a new economic system to do so
the native people did not have many
obvious trade products, except furs, plus the Europeans
wiped out an estimated 90% of the population of Mexico
(mostly by imported diseases, but also by war and harsh
slavery)
In order to enrich themselves from the
Americas, Europeans chose to colonize and grow cash crops
(eg. sugar, tobacco, eventually cotton) using slaves from
Africa
this system turned out to be very
profitable; much
of the capital for the industrial revolution came from
plantations worked by slaves and the slave trade
new popular luxuries like sugar and tea
brought ordinary people, including British farmers, more
into the capitalist system; wanting to make more money to
buy more things
In 1750 in England--what made for a
good domestic market (consumers ready to buy products from the
factories)
most land was owned by large landowners (more on this in
ch. 5)
most farmers were already buying goods, not living only
on what they could produce on their own land
farmers were interested in making and spending more
money--beginning to think like consumers
craft production was widely scattered in small villages
so many landowners stood to profit from new transportation
technologies
government policies favored manufacturing--only those who
owned property could vote and the large landowners wanted to
maximize profit from their estates (review the basics of the British
parliamentary system)
between 1770 and 1850 the economy of England
changed from mostly agricultural to mostly industrial
this was the result not of one key invention
but of technological progress in different fields coming
together in a snowball effect
its center is the development of factories
(which hadn't really existed before this time), but they
couldn't have developed without better
transportation creating larger markets and better
transportation couldn't have existed without the growth of the
iron industry, which couldn't have grown without steam engines
society had a hard time adjusting to the new
economic system
this is the beginning of technology changing
quickly enough that peoples lives were transformed by
technology within their lifetimes, not over many generations
charts below of the different types of wealth
owned by individuals show the declining importance of land and
the economic significance of slavery in the US
long term trends for the US (working=manufacturing)
The key change is
the development of factories
Factories:
large scale production
mass production--produce lots of the same thing quickly
division of labor--workers doing different parts of the
job rather than one craftsman doing the whole job
multiple
machines
and
workers
in one place using some non-human power source—eg. Water
power, steam engine, electricity
Industrial revolution was made possible by
new technologies that led to growth of factories
Does manufacturing=industry?
manufacturing is actually a general term for making
things
technologically, the industrial revolution is when
manufacturing shifts from home work to factories
machines (particularly steam power) were developed for
other tasks like transportation
Hobsbawm says England already had manufacturing (but it didn't
have factories)
that helped the industrial revolution get started
Manufacturing is making things, either on a small scale
or a large scale, either by mass production or by hand work
one at a time.
For example, before the industrial revolution woolen cloth was
made by the putting out system:
A merchant would buy wool and carry it to people who
spun it into thread
Then pick it up and carry it to people who wove it into
cloth
Then pick it up and sell the cloth
The people who spun and wove worked in their own
homes.Cheaper for merchant because you don’t have to pay for
the building
Only when new machines are invented is it worthwhile to
build a factory
What
is crucial (according to Hobsbawm?
Domestic market--critical pre-existing condition
Britain
already had well-established trade and
pre-industrial manufacturing (domestic
market provided a good base)
British
government had policies that favored
manufacturing
Empire: the spark
was overseas trade with British colonies,
which increased very rapidly
markets
capital
(particularly from the slave trade)
the empire set
the rules for trade
What about technology?
economic changes came first and made
opportunities for new technology
market for large quantities of goods
factory owners who were willing to do almost
anything to make money, not worried about who would get hurt
this page written and copyright Pamela E. Mack
last updated 8/28/2019