relationship between technology and the arts in the coming of
modernism
- technology replaced some of the traditional functions
of art (eg. photography)
- sense of living in a new age, throw out tradition and
find new ways of designing objects
- how to make something functional and beautiful at the
same time (not decoration)
- new technology made new things possible, such as
skyscrapers, but it is not just that
- educated urban people are excited about throwing out
traditions and living in new ways
Design:
Design--what visual approach do you take to
solving the problem of function (definition used in design
field)
(in engineering design is more how do you put the pieces
together to solve the problem, considering a wide range of
who is affected)
functionality
Painting: Anne Wallace, Eames Chair,
2004
Eames chair
Charles
and Ray Eames built new simpler furniture--you
may
not
like
modern
art
but
our
world is full of that kind of furniture, not old-fashioned
furniture. Think of the shock it must have been--that
isn't what a chair is supposed to look like but it does the
job well. It was a startling new
way of seeing the world. 1956
video, Ted talk
(3:40)
They designed the 1977 film Powers
of Ten (there is also a 1968
version)--explicitly about seeing the world in a new
way as a result of science.
Architecture example: the Guggenheim Museum in New York:
Architecture was transformed by new technology but also by
architects who gave up all traditional notions of what a
building was supposed to look like and started fresh with the
question of what would do the job well
Another example: bridges
Princeton structural
engineering professor David
Billington argues that Robert
Maillart's bridges are beautiful precisely because
they are efficient structural design.
This is the modern way: what is purely
functional is likely to be beautiful
History:
American architecture initially used wood, which was in very
short supply in Europe but very plentiful in most of North
America
- Before the modern era: In the 1830s a new design was
created: balloon
frame
construction, which made it possible to build houses
quickly and cheaply
- the houses are light and sturdy, almost like a basket
- Habitat
for Humanity houses usually use balloon frame construction
- to this day many other countries don't build homes
this way: Germany
- cities grew quickly
- the trouble was cities made of wooden buildings (and
wooden
sidewalks
over the dirt streets) were a fire hazard
- before the beginning of modern, most American cities
(particularly away from the east coast, were built of wood
when a great fire burned central Chicago in 1871, people
realized the city would need to be rebuilt in a more
fire-proof way
this led Chicago to
- laws about using fireproof materials
- more use of iron instead of wood
- what would happen if you built a balloon frame out of
steel instead of wood?
- this makes taller buildings possible and more
efficient
- the first city to start to build taller and taller
Several technologies were needed to make this
possible:
Eiffel Tower
Steel Frame:
- the earliest taller buildings had load-bearing
stone walls, but the taller the building the thicker the
stone wall needs to be at the bottom
- the Eiffel Tower shows the pure steel frame--picture
to right
- Steel
frame
construction developed about 1890 for the
skyscrapers of Chicago. First steel frame was 1885 for a 9
story building, then 1892 for 21 stories
- the workers who built these frames in New York were
in many cases Mohawk
Indians because they had little fear of heights
Foundation:
- concrete pillars that extended down to bedrock
- or steel piles (vertical beams) are forced into the
ground by a pile
driver
Elevator
- people won't accept tall buildings without a safe way
to get up and down
- the hydraulic
elevator was the first practical technology, later
replaced by electric elevators
- Early elevators had a car connected by a rope or
cable to a weight, but what if the cable broke?--elevators
were considered too dangerous for passengers. Otis
Tufts invented an elevator that rode on a metal shaft like
a screw, which was the first to catch on for passengers
but very slow
- Elisha
Graves
Otis invented a reliable elevator
safety
brake for cable elevators in 1853, but in the first
7 months after he started his company he only received one
order. His device triggered if the cable was not
taught and grabbed hold of the guide rails on either side
of the elevator car
- Otis demonstrated
his invention in 1854 at the New York Crystal Palace
Exposition (a world's fair), cutting the rope supporting
the platform he was standing on, and his invention began
to catch on (more
of the story), though still at first only for
freight elevators. Elevators began to be installed
in hotels and stores in the 1860s
- escalators
are a later technology--invented in 1892 and they didn't
catch on until the 1930s, but think of what it meant to
people to have a moving stairway--we no longer had to do
the work ourselves
tall buildings weren't necessarily cost efficient but they
became a sign of pride
- Leiter
Building (right)--early steel frame construction
(1885). A steel frame makes it cheaper to build a
traditional building
- Reliance Building in Chicago, 1891-1895
- many of the early skyscrapers still had traditional
decorations on the outside:
13-story
Bayard-Condict Building in New York, designed
by Louis Sullivan
and built in 1898--use new technology to do
traditional things
Sullivan and the other architects working in Chicago paid more
attention to decoration than the architects in New York.
Sullivan invented his own new
style of ornamentation
when a 26 story building was build in Manhattan many said
that the maximum height had been attained, but 1912 a 55 story
building was built and in 1932 the Empire
State
Building was 86 stories. It was the tallest building in
the world from 1931 until 1973.
- skyscraper history
and economics
in New
York:
- have more offices in a
smaller footprint--buy less land, have more people
working together
- skyscrapers are
visible--good advertising
- space to lease to others
- economics aren't always
favorable, there are other things going on like showing
off
- New York zoning
law in 1916 to make sure you could still see the
sky, that streets were not too canyon-like
- required setbacks
- this resulted in
skyscrapers with plazas around them
Modernist
architects started to simplify the building
- is a building with no decorations going to be boring
to look at
- is a functional building beautiful? Or does it get
boring and lose individuality
- first they focused on what was functional--instead of
decoration, simple functional forms would be a new
standard of beauty
- then they started exploring what they could do if
they threw out old assumptions
masterworks of modern (and postmodern) architecture stamps
Guggenheim
Museum
Chrysler
Building
Vanna
Venturi House
TWA
Terminal at JFK Airport, New York
Walt
Disney Concert Hall
860-880
Lake Shore Drive
East
wing of the National Gallery
The Glass House
Yale
Art and Architecture Building
High
Museum of Art, Atlanta
Exeter
Academy Library
Hancock
Center, Chicago
this has become even more elaborate in postmodern buildings
(post-modern involves more elaboration and decoration, less
strictly functional)
What are the themes here?
- throw out tradition
- what can we do with new technology
- design for function, maybe
- buildings as a way to show off