"Where does human infatuation with technology lead?"
- has technology dramatically changed our lives?
- in what ways are we infatuated with technology
- we pay attention to technology and neglect other
things
- do we focus on technology more than on other things
that change our lives?
- when we want to solve a problem do we favor
technological solutions? (technological fix)
- do we we tend to focus on technology too much
Where will human enthusiasm for technology lead us?
- do you think we are too enthusiastic about
technology?
- the singularity
(Ray Kurzweil)
- computers smarter than humans by 2029
- computers are already smarter than humans in
tasks with clear rules and facts
- computers can beat the best humans at chess, and
even at the game of Go
- we can now program computers
that learn
- take data and figure out patterns for
themselves
- the problem is there is inevitably bias built
into the data
- computers can figure things out for
themselves--neural networks
- and computers that are at least somewhat
creative
- at present a lot of new uses of computers to
generate new mixes of ideas (in art or writing)
- but computers don't have intuition, or
do they?
- some problems are at least in part mathematically
solvable--eg. Atlanta traffic
- computers are increasingly able to come up with
the solutions to complex problems with the best
measurable results
- for those kind of problems, at some point
computers will be able to make better decisions than
humans
- this is real enough that we need to take it
seriously
- computers able to design better computers
(self-replicating)
- computers can do the work and we will have more
leisure
- use technology to improve humans
- would you upload your brain into a robot to live
forever?
- Kurzweil is an example of someone who is infatuated
with technology
- sometimes do we hope technology will give us an easy
fix for our problems, that might be solved better another
way?
consider a spectrum from rejecting technology (eg. Amish)
to technology will allow us to do everything (eg. Kurzweil)
- where do you fall on that spectrum
- Where does Nye fall on that spectrum
or another spectrum of how quickly you adopt
new technologies:
how do new technologies catch on:
- innovators try things first, but their friends don't
listen
- early adopters/opinion leaders try something new and
their friends listen
- early majority
- late majority
- laggards
but what about the direction of change?
technological progress in a particular
direction is not inevitable
but because of human enthusiasm change is rapid
yet we have trouble updating our vision (understanding)
to how the world has changed
We think technology gives us freedom,
wealth..., but does it really?
(We easily see these benefits of
technology, but what potential problems should we pay
attention to?)
- in some ways yes, but there are also
limits/problems/side effects
- technology gives us some things, allows us to do some
things, but there are other things that are important too
- we may pay less attention to other things than we
should
- there are a lot of different things we can do
- technology seems like the easiest and most
predictable way of improving something
- or we could try to improve community, but changes
that aren't based on technology are more controversial
and it is harder to know whether they will work
- we are biased towards technological solutions
- are there things that we can do that aren't
technological that might be more important
- or are there ways to use technology more wisely
towards broader goals
What has Nye told us about technology (review)
- technology is a fundamental human expression
- the path of technological growth is not inevitable,
in fact it isn't even predictable
- historians find technologies are shaped by their
context, they are not independent of society and do not
transform the world from outside
- people can use technologies for many ends, and people
usually prefer variety
- consider next what about the problems technology
causes:
- does technology make us wealthy, or does is give us
more material things but reduce our quality of life in
other ways
- how is it going to affect other people with different
cultures or opportunities
- are we going to need to reduce resource consumption
or the damage we do to the environment?
- can we solve such problems simply by inventing better
technologies or will we need to consume less?
- does technology take away jobs?--not so far, but it
changes jobs
- does technology reduce or increase our freedom?
- reduces freedom by making things more the same or
by making us dependent on it
- increases freedom by allowing us to do more
- we have more information, is that always a good
thing? does that give us more opportunities for
self-expression
What can we do to increase the benefits of technology and
decrease the negative effects? Understand that we have choices
How do we make decisions and put those decisions into
effect about what technological direction to go in?
- since the direction of technology is not inevitable,
it is possible and necessary to make decisions
- we make those decisions for ourselves by asking good
questions (thinking critically about technology)
- we start with our values, examine whether a
particular technology will serve or act against those
values
- how do our individual choices have any impact--how do
we put them into effect
- we can make wise choices of technology for ourselves,
as consumers
- can we simply trust the marketplace? Nye says
no because corporations don't necessarily develop the
technologies that would benefit us most
- is government control a better alternative? Nye
says not with the institutions we have now
- he would like to see citizens have more voice in
choosing where we want technology to take us
no-
we have real choices
do people know enough to make choices between technologies?
- are choices available and visible?
- can we understand enough to know what risks we
take?
- understanding the science and
technology--sometimes called technological literacy
- having information on the consequences of
different choices
- having thought about what kind of society we want
- do we think the technologies we have grown up with
are natural and not question them?
- we very quickly take technologies for granted and
don't question them
- watch out for the human tendency to naturalize
things
How do we live well with change?
- recognize that the world is always changing and we
need to be aware of new understanding and ways of doing
things
- being willing to choose what works for you, not just
follow what is around you
- build community around what is important to you, use
technology to do what you value
can we improve how we choose and use technology to make our
lives better?
- start with watch out for the negative side effects of
technology
- Nye--we don't have to do everything we can do
- we can evaluate new technology critically, thinking
about whether we want the ways it changes our lives
- shape the technology and the way we use it to benefit
us more
- we can choose the technologies we want
- by consumer choice
- by regulation
- by seeking the kinds of technological opportunities
we want
How
does technology make us more creative?
- the internet allows many more people to write or
compose music or make art and share it with the world
- you can find communities around whatever you are
excited about
- maker movement--we don't have to be passive consumers
- the internet gives us an alternative way to learn
skills such as cooking, carpentry, or car maintenance
- The maker
movement seeks to reclaim making things ourselves
- 3d
printers allow us to creatively make objects at home
and allow more flexible manufacturing
- you can make your own design or download open
source designs
- home printers are not expensive, and the Watt
Center has printers for students to use
- you can upload your design to sites like Shapeways
for printing at reasonable cost in
materials you can't afford to work with at home
- Etsy, Artfire and other web sites allow people to
easily sell things they make
- bio-hacking:
people who try to adjust their bodies with food choices
and supplements
- individual creativity, more opportunities for
artisans and craftspeople
- open source movement: make software and other designs
free and modifiable instead of patented and sold for a
profit (some people doing this are hobbyists, others
- we have more room now to be creators, not just
consumers
Will the effect of technology in the future be different
from its effect so far?
We have many possible futures made possible by technology.
Which one do we want?