Read for the argument--how
does
Crosby prove his points
- cause and effect
- natural
experiments--if the
conditions were different was the outcome different
- science of ecology:
for example
European crops needed bees
- argue from
exceptions or
extreme examples that illustrate a point clearly
We've seen how the plants
succeeded and how the animals succeeded
Third part of the story of the
ecological success of the Europeans in the neo-Europes
- why in some places
but not
others were the Europeans able to nearly eliminate the
native population
- there were more
natives
with more sophisticated civilization than we often
realize
- disease is key--many
different diseases and it is hard to tell which killed
the most people
Aztec
smallpox
victims
Smallpox was endemic in
Europe
we know more about it just because it is easy to identify
- endemic=widespread
and
constantly present
- spreads from person
to
person but can be spread by dry material for many months
- in Europe people
usually
got
smallpox before they were 2, 10-15% died
- in somewhat more
isolated
areas outbreaks happened about every 5 years (in later
colonial America
the density wasn't high enough for smallpox to be
endemic and there
were dangerous epidemics among the colonists)
- the neo-Europes were
isolated places where the disease was not already
present
- because of lack of
immunity
among the native people it became an
epidemic
- among natives not
previously exposed, 1/3 to 1/2 died
- The death rate in
many
Indian communities was even higher than that because of
starvation or
unhelpful disease treatment traditions, such as sweat
baths
- people living in
isolated
areas with few diseases may have evolved weaker or less
diverse immune
systems
"The role of disease in
American
conquest was threefold: firstly, it reduced the fighting
capability of
the Aztec and Incan armies as they became sick and died.
Secondly, the
deaths of their heads of political leadership left power
vacuums, and
much of the attention of vassal leaders was occupied with
civil wars.
The conquistadors played factions against each other.
Thirdly, the
prevailing beliefs of these cultures led them to believe
that the
European forces were employing supernatural powers, and many
military
leaders decided to either join the conquistadors, or flee,
rather than
fight them. Consequently, resistance was weak, disorganized,
and
usually nonexistent." (Graeme Kennedy)
What we think of as the indian civilization in North America
is
actually what was left after diseases had done much harm
the southeastern US had a dense elaborate native
civilization
before Columbus, perhaps as sophisticated as the Mayans
- Mississippi Moundbuilders approx. 900-1550 AD
- closest major site
is Etowah
Mounds in
northern Georgia
- they didn't use much
stone
for building and the settlers didn't meet them so we
know
little about them
- elaborate pottery
and stone
tools
- they had cities and
systems
of government
- that civilization
was wiped
out and the land significantly depopulated
before settlers arrived
- that was the result
of
Europeans diseases which spread faster than
settlers did
- the settlers found a
land
with very low population--with an empty ecological niche
ready for
human beings--their competition had already been wiped
out
for another example of
that
civilization see Anna
Site
again the exchange was
one-sided
- the Europeans
brought lots
of dangerous diseases
- they didn't catch
local
diseases
- why weren't there
local
diseases? because there were very few domestic animals
and less crowding
at most only one disease
imported
from the neo-Europes caused
significant problems in Europe
- even the theory that
syphilis
came
from the Americas is now debated:
- people in Europe at
the
time believed that syphilis came from the Americas
- there is good
evidence
of syphilis in Europe before Columbus
- the trick is that
the
disease has changed
over time, sometimes becoming more serious, sometimes
less
- a disease can mutate
into
something more dangerous
Europeans had had to learn
to
live with the diseases they brought with
them
Neo-Europes had fewer diseases because of less crowded
conditions, fewer domestic animals, and isolation
- Europe was more
crowded and
so epidemic diseases became endemic
- any area where
people
aren't crowded enough for diseases to become endemic
will have problems
with epidemics
- Europeans had more
diseases
because they had more domestic animals
- and they often
shared the
same building with their animals
- diseases that
evolved in
different places came together in Europe
- isolated places
didn't see
as many diseases
- Europeans had come
to an
ecological balance with their diseases
Disease explains how the
Europeans were able to displace the native population
it doesn't explain how they were able to remake the entire
ecosystem to
look like Europe
How we live with diseases--consider chickenpox
- chicken pox isn't a
dangerous disease, so we used to just let people catch
it
- now we have a
vaccination
- it can be dangerous
for
certain people
- the recommendation
to
vaccinate was justified on cost benefit analysis--lost
work time of
parents