Muir, even more than Thoreau, played a key role in
popularizing love of wilderness
Born in Scotland in
1838, family moved to Wisconsin when he was 11
He grew
up in a harsh home--his father had a very strict
view of Christianity and the importance of hard
work--Muir thought wilderness far more appealing than
civilization
he escaped to the
University of Wisconsin, where he discovered the ideas
of natural theology and transcendentalism
he was talented as
an inventor and considered that as a career until he
nearly lost his sight in an accident
he walked a
thousand miles to the gulf of Mexico, then took a
ship to San Francisco and headed for the mountains
he discovered the
Yosemite valley and stayed
his ideas came from transcendentalism--nature is a mirror
reflecting the Creator
"Thousands of tired,
nerve-shaken, over-civilized people are beginning to
find out that going to the mountain is going home; that
wildness is necessity; that mountain parks and
reservations are useful not only as fountains of timber
and irrigating rivers, but as fountains of life. "
"Wander a whole
summer if you can. Thousands of God's blessings will
search you and soak you as if you were a sponge, and the
big days will go by uncounted. If you are
business-tangled and so burdened by duty that only weeks
can be got out of the heavy laden year, give a month at
least. The time will not be taken from the sum of life.
Instead of shortening, it will indefinitely lengthen it
and make you truly immortal. "
In God's wildness
lies the hope of the world - the great fresh unblighted,
unredeemed wilderness. The galling harness of
civilization drops off, and wounds heal ere we are
aware. -- John of the
Mountains
Against the building
of a dam in a valley near Yosemite: "These
temple-destroyers, devotees of ravaging commercialism,
seem to have a perfect contempt for Nature, and instead
of lifting their eyes to the God of the mountains, lift
them to the Almighty Dollar. Dam Hetch Hetchy! As well
dam for water-tanks the people's cathedrals and
churches, for no holier temple has ever been consecrated
by the heart of man."
"When we try to pick
out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything
else in the Universe." -- My First
Summer in the Sierra
he took it much
farther than Thoreau or Emerson, glorying in being alone
in the wilderness
what he said that was new was seeing wild nature as having
the right to exist for its own sake, not just for the
benefit of human beings:
"No dogma taught by the
present civilization seems to form so insuperable an
obstacle in a way of a right understanding of the
relations which culture sustains as to wilderness, as that
which declares that the world was made especially for the
uses of men. Every animal, plant, and crystal controverts
it in the plainest terms. Yet it is taught from century to
century as something ever new and precious, and in the
resulting darkness the enormous conceit is allowed to go
unchallenged." from "Wild Wool", 1875.
"Nevertheless, again and
again, in season and out of season, the question comes up,
'What are rattlesnakes good for?' As if nothing that does
not obviously make for the benefit of man had any right to
exist; as if our ways were God's ways. Long ago, an Indian
to whom a French traveler put this old question replied
that their tails were good for toothache, and their heads
for fever. Anyhow, they are all, head and tail, good for
themselves, and we need not begrudge them their share of
life." -- Our National Parks,
ch. 2.
"Why should man value
himself as more than a small part of the one great unit of
creation? And what creature of all that the Lord has taken
the pains to make is not essential to the completeness of
that unit - the cosmos? The universe would be incomplete
without man; but it would also be incomplete without the
smallest transmicroscopic creature that dwells beyond our
conceitful eyes and knowledge. From the dust of the earth,
from the common elementary fund, the Creator has made Homo
sapiens. From the same material he has made every other
creature, however noxious and insignificant to us. They
are earth-born companions and our fellow mortals.... This
star, our own good earth, made many a successful journey
around the heavens ere man was made, and whole kingdoms of
creatures enjoyed existence and returned to dust ere man
appeared to claim them. After human beings have also
played their part in Creation's plan, they too may
disappear without any general burning or extraordinary
commotion whatever." -- A
Thousand-Mile Walk to the Gulf(1916)
Muir takes preservation
ideas further--we should preserve wilderness for its own
sake
The conservation movement split between wise use and
preservation
"wise use": set
aside natural resources for future use and manage them
wisely (Pinchot & the Forest Service)
preservationists
want natural areas unaltered by humans, for their own
sake
Muir tried to have
it both ways for a while but ended up a leading
preservationist
In 1890 Muir published two
articles in a leading magazine calling for the preservation
of the Sierra mountains around the Yosemite Valley as a
national park like Yellowstone, only Muir explicitly said
the goal was to preserve wilderness. A bill was
quickly passed and signed.
he writes widely
read articles to change public opinion
this was the first
important example of creating a park for the sake of
wilderness, not tourists or practical benefits
Teddy
Roosevelt
and John Muir in Yosemite in 1903
In 1892 Muir founded the Sierra Club
The wise use side:
Meanwhile at the same time the federal government also
passed a law setting aside forest reserves, leading to the
National Forests, which have a very different philosophy
than the National Parks
Forestry was
developing as a profession--one of the key leaders was Gifford
Pinchot
Pinchot argued for sustained yield--if
it takes your trees 100 years to grow cut down and
replant 1/10 of the forest every 10 years
see trees as a
crop--the trees are going to die anyway so why not use
them
you also need
forests to protect water resources
use the forests for
the long-term greatest
good of the nation (benefit the public, as is
appropriate in a democracy)--there can a tension between
private profit and the public interest
wise use--cut down trees only
as fast as they grow again
this wasn't Muir's
idea of preservation
National Park and National Forest
systems developed very differently
the Forest Service
is part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Park
Service is part of the Department of the Interior
so long as forestry
techniques involved cutting only selected trees,
sustained yield seemed like a good idea to many people
multiple use--we can use
forests for timber production and recreation both
but when new
technology made clearcutting (rather than selective
cutting) the more efficient approach and cutting
increased in the 1950s and 1960s the public was
horrified
The Greatest Good
ch. 4 to Hetch Hetchy
Muir's view?
"Any
fool
can destroy trees. They cannot run away; and if they could,
they would still be destroyed - chased and hunted down as
long as fun or a dollar could be got out of their bark
hides. Branching horns, or magnificent bole backbones. Few
that fell trees plant them; nor would planting avail much
towards getting back anything like the noble primeval
forests. It took more than three thousand years to make some
of the trees in these Western woods - trees that are still
standing in perfect strength and beauty, waving and singing
in the mighty forests of the Sierra. Through all the
wonderful, eventful centuries God has cared for these trees,
saved them from drought, disease, avalanches, and a thousand
straining, leveling tempests and floods; but he cannot save
them from fools - only Uncle Sam can do that. "