Consider an
example--restoring the ecosystem at the Savannah River Plant
government facility
no longer needed to make bomb material
new task--clean up
the mess
restore the
ecosystem
but even the natural
areas have been changed by wild pigs and invasive
species
what was there
before you built the reactors was exhausted farmland in
bad shape
If we have messed up the
environment and want to restore it to its original state,
what is that original state?
before there were
any human beings there?
when the Indians
lived there?
what was it like
in 1492?
what was it like
when the Europeans started farming there?
before settlers
really changed things a lot?
Watch out for "common sense" assumptions that may be
wrong, such as:
there is a balance of nature
and all we have to do is restore that
the native Americans lived in
harmony with the environment and didn't mess it up
The natural state of the
natural world isn't balance:
the natural state of some
piece of land is something that changes over time as the
environment changes
do ecosystems have a
natural equilibrium?
the old idea
was: "Except for a catastrophic event
such as a widespread fire, for example, a forest will
maintain itself and its inhabitants over a long period of
time. If there is a catastrophic event, the ecosystem will
reestablish itself through succession over a period of
time, and eventually return to a stable populations of
plants and animals." (originally from
http://members.bellatlantic.net/%7Ebjmcg/Story4_vietnam_rats_deer.html)
is this true? Not most of
the time, according to scientists. Are those
catastrophic events not a part of nature?
even setting aside
catastrophic events, the pattern of an ecosystem is always
shifting
since the balance of
nature is a myth, it is hard to figure out what ecosystem
to restore
Human beings have affected
the environment long before the 20th century
even Native
Americans modified the environment in fundamental ways
(see below)
human beings have
changed the environment in a lot of different ways--do
we count some and not others?
what if we ask what
was the environment like before there were people there
Continental drift
200 million years ago all the continents had combined to
form Pangaea
when they split North America stayed with Europe at first,
so the plants and animals are less different
the plants and animals in Australia and New Zealand were
more different because they were isolated for so long
What is result of the continents separating?
plants and
animals developed differently in each one
partly to fit
the local environment and partly by accident of what
plants and animals were there in the first place
you would think
in each place the animals would evolve to be best
suited to the local environment, so animals coming
in from outside wouldn't have much chance
but it turns out
to be more complicated than that
big question
running through most of the book--why were European
plant and animals in many cases able to take over
and displace the native plants and animals
What happened when the first human beings arrived in some of
the isolated areas?
human beings are
able to quickly adapt to new areas--they don't have to
wait for evolution
humans arrived in
Australia about 40,000 years ago, North America later
some 10,000 years
ago with the end of the ice ages isolation resumed
they changed the
environment
some large
mammals
disappeared shortly thereafter (extinction of the
megafauna), but probably not just from hunting
human-started
fires shaped the longleaf pine-wiregrass ecosystem
of the sandhills and other environments
Consider the California
Condor:
it was part of the
ecosystem with the megafauna
has been in decline
since the extinction of the megafauna
it would probably be
going extinct even if civilization hadn't come along
should we save it?
Europeans came into
an environment that was not stable, it was changing
The people of Australia and the
Americas did not develop as advanced technology and farming
as the people of Europe and Asia. In particular they
had far fewer kinds of domestic animals and were
particularly short on animals to do work
Around
5000
years ago the people of Mesopotamia (Sumerians) had a
full range of domesticated livestock and cities and writing
appeared (Crosby lumps this with the invention of
agriculture, but there are two steps, agriculture and
irrigation)
Weeds, varmints (mice, rats, flies, etc.), and
diseases were problems Europeans struggled with on an
ongoing basis
Particularly in
winter animals were often stabled in the ground floor of
the family home
Living in close
proximity to livestock meant diseases went back and
forth (eg. smallpox, influenza)
People lived in
crowded conditions and and raised tightly packed crops
People coming from a
crowded area have a disease advantage when they spread
to other areas.
Even in Siberia, which had
almost the same plants and animals as Europe, the indigenous
people were laid low by diseases brought by Europeans
smallpox
What happens when the European people and system
of farming arrive in other places with different
histories?