Larson 12
In 1953 Watson and Crick figured
out the structure
of DNA, showing how genes work
- Larson leaves out the story of Rosalind
Franklin
- could all of biology be reduced to DNA?
- molecular biology becomes the prestigious field, not
people who actually study animals
- people were excited by the new tools
- biology can become more like physics and therefore
higher prestige
- some scientists were eager to find mechanistic
explanations--we can make science so complete we don't
need God to explain things
- DNA research showed how closely related different
species were: humans and chimpanzees share 98% of their DNA
other scientists like E. O. Wilson
argued that social behavior had a genetic basis and had evolved
just as much as physical traits (this was an attempt to find
materialist explanations for the things that make us human)
- they explained the evolution of altruism by looking
at evolution from the point of view of the gene, not from
the point of view of the individual
- this was important because altruism was seen as
something that makes us human that can't be explained by
genetics
- Richard Dawkins stressed how random evolution is,
there is no purpose or direction. He liked this
because he took a mechanistic view and wanted to discredit
the idea that God works through evolution.
- Sociobiology--the theory that the specifics of
social behavior are controlled by genetics--upset social
scientists and feminists, and others who emphasized how
society could be improved and how individuals could benefit
from better environments
- they saw it as increasing the danger of our human
biases creeping into science--females
are seen as passive because of the biases of the
experimenter
- p. 278 "Wilson described religion as 'an illusion
fobbed off on us by our genes to get us to cooperate.'"
other controversies in evolution also got public
attention--there were so many social implications that a range
of interpretations was possible even after the success of the
modern synthesis
- Steven
J. Gould as a paleontologist revived the theory of
punctuated equilibrium (when conditions change evolution can
move quickly)
- also wrote popular essays critical of genetic
determinism
- more than a third of scientists gave God some role
in evolution
Evolution:
- change over time
- common descent
- natural selection of small variations
- Mendelian genetics is necessary for this to work
Genetics provides evidence for evolution but also shows
it as more complicated
Review--themes of this book
- the debate about science and religion has changed
very much over time
- evolution is not one thing, but quite different
theories. Evolution by what mechanism?
- yet evolution relates to political ideas about
stability and change and so it keeps taking on larger social
meanings (though those shift over time)
- scientists are often inspired or motivated by weird
political beliefs (creativity is an odd thing) but the
process of working out the details of a new idea over time
works well to make scientific ideas more reliable--science
is self-correcting
- popular acceptance of scientific ideas is very
influenced by other aspects of culture (how was acceptance
of Darwin's ideas over time different for scientists and for
the general public?)
- among scientists--rise and fall and rise again of
Darwinian evolution