Larson 5
![letter from
Charles Darwin to Alfred Russel Wallace](darwin-letter-to-wallace-f61.jpg)
Darwin's book led to almost complete acceptance of evolution by
the scientific community within 20 years
- by providing a partial mechanism
- because science was becoming so focused on
naturalism (do not use supernatural explanations such as
direct creation by God while doing science)
- the idea that species are related in a family tree
made sense of so many patterns, particularly when you add
the fossil record
evolution was accepted, but Darwin's mechanism
became increasingly controversial
--be careful here: it is crucial to see that there was controversy
on the level of details but not on the level of the overall idea
two different ideas about evolution were
catching on--some but not all scientists accepted both:
- descent with modification: species are
related in a family tree (evolution)
- some other process (such as
inheritance of acquired characteristics--Lamark) could
cause the modification
- evolution by natural selection of small
random variations (Larson will call this Darwinism)
Descent with modification was widely accepted in just a
few years and within 20 years no controversy
remained among mainstream scientists in the English-speaking
world: all had adopted it
- but there was still controversy about natural
selection and over the source of variation and some still
saw God's plan in the pattern of development of new species
- modified ideas were popular in Germany from the
tradition of German idealism (species are ideal types)
The idea caught on so quickly because it met the needs
of science
- Darwin's theory fits the political and social
situation of the time (British empire was justified by
survival of the fittest, Germany wanted to be fittest)
- The idea of descent with modification made sense of
the patterns scientists saw and was a good source of
hypotheses for research--adopted because it led to fertile
new scientific questions
- scientists embraced the idea of using only
naturalistic explanations, that supernatural causation had
no place in science
- the older generation was pushed aside, eg. Richard
Owen (who had proposed the apparent similarity of species
was due to archetypes used by the creator)
- note p. 111, even promoter of theistic evolution George Frederick
Wright, wrote "we are to press
known secondary [material] causes as far as they will go
in explaining facts. We are not to resort to an
unknown (i.e., supernatural) cause for explanations of
phenomena till the power of known causes have been
exhausted. If we cease to observe this rule there is
an end to all science and all sound sense."
![embryonic development](comparative_embryology.jpg)
A great deal of research interest in the relationship between
species and missing links
- Earnst Haeckel: Ontology
(or ontogeny) recapitulates phylogeny: related animals
look the same in early fetal development because the
development of the fetus retraces the evolution of the
species
- this is not as clear as Haeckel made it, but at
the time it was seen as overwhelming evidence for
evolution
- Haeckel took his ideas in the direction that
evolution validates competition between nations (survival of
the fittest between ethnic groups which he called races, not
between individuals)
- this was used by the Nazis--science is sometimes
used as a source of authority by politicians
- Alfred Russel Wallace investigated biogeography--the
distribution of species. How different animals were on
isolated islands provided important evidence for evolution
- Wallace believed that a spiritual influx created
humans and that our mission was to abolish the cruelty of
natural selection
New Zealand was particularly unique because of its
extreme isolation
- 89% of native plants are endemic (exist nowhere else
in the world)
- many familiar kinds of animals were
missing and other animals had taken those niches
- before the aborigines (Maori) arrived there were no
land mammals but the bat (therefore birds took many of the
ecological niches usually taken by mammals--for example, the
only large grazing animals were birds)
- also the culture of the people was unusual
one way to think about an ecosystem is as a series of
niches--ecological opportunities
what fills these niches if the usual animals aren't there?
giant
weta
an insect that takes the ecological niche of a mouse--
unfortunately cats think them great entertainment
Another animal filling the niche of the mouse was the
Stephens Island Wren
A flightless songbird--one of only three
flightless songbirds ever known and the world's smallest
- Lived on a one square mile island off the northern
tip of the South Island--a remnant of the ecosystem as it
had been before the Maori brought with them rats
- "It was only seen live on two occasions when it was
disturbed from holes in rocks. It was thought to have been
semi nocturnal and ran very fast like a mouse." (source)
- At the Ornithologists Club in London in 1894 a
collector proudly displayed 10 specimens of the wren that
had been killed by the lighthouse keeper's cat
- He also announced that the species was now extinct
due to the cat
the largest flightless birds, the moas, filled the niche of
grazing animals
![giant moa bigger than the
hunter chasing it with a boomerang](http://pammack.sites.clemson.edu/lec124/moa.jpg)
All 11 species of Moa were hunted to extinction by the Maori in
the 13th and 14th century. They only laid one or two eggs
at a time and took 10 years to grow to maturity so were wiped
out easily.
"Second only in weight to the extinct elephant bird of
Madagascar, the largest moa was the tallest bird on earth, with
the top of its' back 6 feet above the ground" (source)
The largest Moa still weighed over 500 lbs. They ate
mostly bushes and the lower branches of trees. Their beaks
were strong
The Haast's eagle, with wingspan of 3 meters, preyed on the Moa
and died out with it
![Haasts eagle attaching
moas](http://pammack.sites.clemson.edu/lec124/Giant_Haasts_eagle_moa.jpg)
While evolution had become the basis of biology by the
end of the century, natural selection was still controversial
- William Thomson, Lord Kelvin gave evidence from
physics that the earth could not be old enough for gradual
natural selection (his physics was good but he did not know
about radioactivity as a source of heat inside the earth)
- without a theory of genetics it was very difficult
to talk about how characteristics accumulated.
Swamping: if offspring were simply a blend of their parents
then new characteristics would disappear. Fleeming
Jenkin proved this mathematically.
- Darwin had a theory of gemmules that came close to
Mendelian genetics, but he also accepted inheritance of
acquired characteristics to speed up evolution
Four alternative mechanisms for evolution, alternative
theories to Darwinism (gradual random variation selected by
natural selection):
- Theistic evolution: God creates variations according
to a plan
- Lamarkianism: inheritance of acquired
characteristics
- orthogenesis: developmental trends continue whether
or not they are immediately beneficial
- saltation: large mutations provide the variations