Larson 9
The opposition to evolution linked biological evolution
to the scholarly study of the Bible
19th century scholars showed by textual analysis that the
bible had been written over time by different authors, this
made people uncomfortable
- infographic
- Mark was written around 70 CE, John around 94 CE
- 1 Thessalonians, Galatians, Philemon, Philippians,
1-2 Corinthians, Romans, were written by Paul between 50 and
60 CE
- the other epistles were written 88-130 CE probably
by authors other than the names given
- the two creation accounts in Genesis 1:1-2:3 and
Genesis 2:4-25 were interpreted
as written at different times by different authors
American Protestantism was changing
- Evangelical ideas (personal salvation
and fidelity to the Bible as God's word) had spread in
the early to mid 19th century in many churches--Second
Great Awakening
- in the later 19th century mainstream
churches (what are now Presbyterian, USA; United
Methodist; ELA Lutherans) accepted some of the new
biblical scholarship and evangelical churches began to
be established separately
- in the 1910s some evangelicals began
calling themselves fundamentalists, stressing the inerrancy
of the Bible and the Bible as the absolute authority
(infallibility is a weaker claim because that is taken
to mean the Bible is infallible on matters of salvation
and faith but may have errors in matters of no
significance to that message)
- humans wrote down the words of the
Bible exactly as dictated by God
- should be taken literally
- it was new for churches to say you
have to believe this
- or was the bible inspired by God but
written by men according to their best understanding?
- even if the original manuscript was
inerrant, what about copying and translation errors?
- Pentecostals
are a group of evangelicals who added speaking in
tongues
- Christians felt threatened by new ideas
(perhaps with good reason) and rejected more and more of
them
Religious opposition to Darwin's ideas started growing
about 20 years after the publication of Origin of Species,
once the scientific consensus for evolution was clear
- evangelicals and fundamentalists increasingly took a
stand against evolution
- conservative leaders in the large denominations
pushed for them to take a stand as well
- Billy
Sunday preaching
- the exceptions were Episcopalians and
Congregationalists (only about 10% rejected evolution), who
were disproportionately the leaders of society
William Jennings Bryant was a political liberal and
theological conservative
- opposed evolution partly because Social Darwinism
would hurt the poor
- saw a political opportunity in 1922 when legislators
in Kentucky proposed a law to ban the teaching of evolution
in public schools, but it did not pass
- A law did pass in Tennessee in 1925 and a teacher
was promptly recruited to break it
- public high schools were just becoming available and
in some cases required in rural areas
Scopes Trial
- major news coverage
- the prosecution wanted the issue to be whether John
Scopes broke the law, which he did
- but Bryant gave an opening to a broader debate,
which was mostly about the inerrancy of the Bible
- Bryant admitted that he didn't believe that the 6
days of creation were literal 24 hour days
- Scopes was found guilty but later the conviction was
thrown out on a technicality
Other laws against the teaching of evolution were
passed on a small scale, but no one was prosecuted for
breaking them
Why was opposition to evolution on religious grounds so
much stronger in the US?
- tradition of free speech and polarized debate
- new religious movements
- personalities and Americans like extreme
personalities
- note that politics and religion were less linked
then
- tradition from the pilgrims of building a
religious society (however many early leaders of the nation
were deists)
- the US had less historical tradition than European
countries and somewhat less emphasis on social class so
people looked to religion for a secure identity
- people were uncomfortable about change and wanted to
go back to stability
- reconstruction led southerners to believe change
was a bad idea, had recently ended
- particular separation between people struggling
with a changing economy and the elite that was benefiting
(robber barons), those struggling looked for religion for
security
- industrialization and modernization were changing
peoples lives