Principe 5
different
kinds of knowledge, then and now
- the best scientific theories of the time
- world view, background knowledge, how
people make sense of the world, assumptions made by
educated people about how the world works
- common educated people
- common uneducated people who at the time
had available folk and herbal traditions instead of
formal medicine
- is the division more political today
about science?
how does medicine work today?
- empirical--based on experience and
physical knowledge
- evidence-based medicine is being pushed,
but isn't always followed
- today doctors start with diagnosis, then
ideally there is a medication that will kill the germ
causing the disease
- germ theory of disease was only
accepted late 19th century
- the first medicine to kill the germ
causing the disease was invented in 1910
the principle that everything was interconnected meant that
astrology was a big part of medicine
contrary cures: treat a fever with something cool (there
have also been traditions of medicine that used similar
treatment, such as homeopathy)
- In modern terms bile is made by the
liver and stored in the gallbladder, helps with
digestion by breaking down fats
- in the early modern era both yellow
and black bile were understood to have a role in
digestion but yellow bile was also necessary to the
lungs and black bile was also involved in the clotting
of blood
- phlegm was something broader than the
medical meaning of the word today--it included mucus,
saliva, and lymph
- all of these were understood to
circulate in the blood
- how to treat an illness depended on that
particular person's unique balance of humors
- this focus on balance is a totally
different way of thinking about health than today's
focus on diagnosing a particular disease and then giving
a medicine that treats that disease. The first treatment
that worked the modern way was Salvarsan,
invented in 1910.
Physicians
were university educated but surgery was done by less elite
barber-surgeons
- tradition that elite learning was
philosophical
- abstract knowledge had more prestige
than practical knowledge
- university medicine emphasized theory
- getting your hands dirty was low class,
so surgery was done by barber-surgeons, not physicians
- dissection was unpopular but sometimes
practiced
- many people still turned to traditional
healers who used herbs and probably killed fewer people
chemical medicine (mostly minerals or
refined forms) was coming into increased use--antimony and
mercury to cause vomiting and/or diarrhea
The traditional authority in medicine was Galen (130-200 CE,
Hellenistic period)
- medieval students learned anatomy when the professor
read from Galen
and a barber-surgeon dissected a corpse
- Galen said the blood
moves through tiny holes between the right and left
sides of the heart
- Vesalius (1514-1564) did careful dissection and
showed that Galen was wrong about several things
- Vesalius published a book with detailed
illustrations of the body
- Harvey proved the circulation of the blood in 1628
- blood gets from the arteries to the veins in
capillaries--these are so small they were not actually seen
until after Harvey's death
- blood moves in circles in the body just like the
planets
Early microscopes had tiny glass spheres as
the lens--what is going on is not so much new technology as
eagerness to observe and the idea that the body was
mechanical
- with a simple microscope you can see sperm.
The theory of preformationism said they have a miniature
form of the future person inside, homonucleus (by this
theory the mother contributed only the material)
- this was particularly embrace by those who saw the
body as a machine
- the alternative theory was epigenesis: the person is
formed in stages during development starting from shapeless
semen and menstrual blood--this must be organized by
something that might be called a soul or vital spirit
Joan Baptista van Helmont (1579-1644) was a
vitalist, focusing on the spirit of life rather than on the
body as simply a mechanical system
- rejected Aristotelian, Paracelcian and Galenic ideas
- picked up the ancient idea that the only element is
water, combined with immaterial organizing ideas (semina)
- planted a tree in a fixed weight of soil and watered
it. The tree grew and the soil didn't diminish, so the
water must be what became the tree (note the difficulty of
trying to base knowledge on experiment)
- diseases come from seeds, something more like germs,
not just imbalance, but the organizing principle of the body
(archeus) if strong enough can fight them off
- he provided one basis for a new medicine (just as
the new astronomy needed a new physics), but older ideas
survived into the 19th century
- not much improvement in treatment
Botany and zoology (=flora and fauna)
- symbolic meanings were as important as physical
facts (and in fact were not seen as different kinds of
things)
- how to organize a collection of curiosities?
- books showing different kinds of plants or animals
included symbolic meanings and mystical animals
- they didn't draw a line between "facts" and
symbolism
- the discovery of many new plants and animals made
the ancient authorities obsolete
- but there was a lot of controversy about new
theories
people were throwing out the old theories
it was hard to come up with something useful to replace them
science is growing in the direction of isolating and
simplifying and experiment and away from everything is
connected, but gradually