Graham ch. 2
what was Palchinsky's strategy?
engineering
ethics and examples
We pick up the story with Palchinsky under arrest for being a
part of the provisional government (democratic socialist)
but the Soviets decide they need experts from the previous
government, and he was a prime example
how does he make sense of working for a government he disagrees
with?
feared Soviet meddling in science
- decisions about which scientific
theory is right being made on political grounds
- by non-scientists
- by scientists by their own
opinion
- by scientists under pressure
(eg. in the Soviet Union)
believed in central planning but
with room for regional variations
opposed giant factories for low technology goods
felt that treating workers well was crucial for success
- criticized Taylorism, wanted
to replace it with humanitarian engineering
- educate the workers so they
can figure out the efficient way
- but he also saw experts such as engineers as
making the big decisions, rather than the workers
- the Bolsheviks (communists) believed they were
a movement of the working class against capitalists and
experts, but they wanted to show off rapid development even if
it came at the price of mistreating workers
wanted engineers to take on a
broader role, thinking about social issues rather than just
providing technical solutions
did not want engineering organizations controlled by the party
(people whose opinion would be based on political rather than
technical considerations)
this fit less and less well as Stalin increased his power and
paranoia
- Stalin feared that engineers
who didn't believe in communism would sabotage projects
- in 1928 Palchinsky and other
engineers were arrested and accused of conspiring to
overthrow the government and restore capitalism. That wasn't
true but they criticized the government too much
- Palchinsky was seen as the
ringleader and was secretly executed, others were tried in a
show trial called the Industrial Party Trial
- The prosecution stated that "the Industrial
Party consisted of the top old engineering-technical intelligentsia, of major
specialists and professors, who held privileged positions
during the capitalist regime" (Wikipedia)
- they were accused of slowing progress by the
decisions they made, a more subtle form of sabotage. They were
scapegoats who could be blamed for those times when rapid
industrialization didn't work
- about 30% of all Soviet
engineers were arrested in the period--some were sent to
labor camps where many died, other to special prisons to
continue their work
technocracy: scientists and engineers should make rational
decisions instead of democracy
if you are going to do central planning the advantage should be
experts can make the decisions
in the USSR centrally planned decisions were made by political
leaders rather than experts
how to use experts well
- competing experts
- decisions about values are
political, not solvable by experts