Smil 3b
some traditional farming that persisted
why did agriculture improve so slowly?
what do we mean by improve?
- work shorter
days
- less strenuous
work
- machine might
allow you to use animal or fossil fuel energy to do the
work
- plants with
higher yield (more labor for harvesting, more water and
fertilizer)
- support a
larger population
Egypt:
- agricultural year based on the flooding of the
Nile
- some control of floodwaters but no irrigation
canals
- water was raised by hand only for gardens
- in Roman times provided surplus for the empire
China:
high population density and central bureaucracy (with high taxes)
led to very high intensity agriculture
- canal systems to use water from a river for
irrigation--half of fields were irrigated
- transportation of human and animal wastes for
fertilizer was a key use of labor for dry farming in the north
- a quarter of fields were terraced
- much more technological innovation
- control of flooding of rice fields
- chain of buckets water pumps
- horse collar
Central America and Mexico:
- rock wall terraces and canal networks
- fields built up in shallow lakes, called
chinampas
- very labor intensive but also very productive
Europe:
behind China until the 17th century
- lower population density and more animals
- also more use of green manure and fallowing
- agricultural productivity slowing increased in
the middle ages
- use of horses
- heavy moldboard plows that turned the soil
and provided drainage
- the big increase in productivity came in the
18th century
European settlement of North America:
- at first colonists brought medieval technology
and adopted some native American practices
- rapid introduction of complex horsedrawn
machines in the 19th century
- steel plow with steel moldboard (much less
friction)
- McCormick reaper
- horsedrawn combines in areas with large dry
fields, mostly the great plains
- this was the most intense substitution of
animal for human labor, farmland was plentiful enough to
grow food for them
- steam powered tractors were used a little by
the end of the century but only of limited use
- making the machines and transportation of
the product was increasingly dependent on coal
Patterns:
- intensifying traditional agriculture was more
often based on human labor than animal power
- growing more food allowed large cities and
more people to do other kinds of work
- nutrition tended to get worse, not better
- 19th century America reached the limits of
animal power--another source of power was needed
- local fertilizer (manure and green manure)
also limited the production possible
- intensification initially happened in
difficult environments and areas with high population density
Subsistence compromise: don't put in the labor to
grow more than to meet basic needs
- but then when there is a drought you are in
trouble
- farmers defined a good life as working less,
not possessing more things
- until you have an economic system that gives
you other possibilities
- large families means more to share the labor,
but then you need more food
Different measures:
- people you can support per hectare (ha--about
2.5 acres)
- productivity per person hour or number of
people you can feed per farmer
- energy productivity
- how many seeds are the yield compared to the
number you planted (in the Bible this is called increase)
- weight or bushels per acre
what does it mean to be technologically ahead