3/8/18
the US was already the leader in
mass production, but European technology was generally still ahead
Europeans were impressed by the assembly line but it took years
to adopt it even
partially--less of a mass market
why were European markets smaller?
- countries were smaller and had different rules
- wages were lower relative to cost of living
- don't raise wages the way Ford did
- Ford needs to raise wages to have enough
workers
- understands that paying workers more means
selling more cars
- WWI in Europe created a manufacturing boom
in the US requiring higher wages to get workers
- more rigid class system--cars are only for the
better off
WWI made it essential to apply the assembly line to weapons
but American companies were slow to adapt their cars to European
markets
European car makers used less mass production in order to be
able to offer more models and more frequent model changes
workers and consumers valued individuality and tradition
the assembly line was "a metaphor for an unwanted
modernity"
modernism:
- not just what is new in the present day, but
an early 20th century change
- new technology like photography causes artists
to go in new directions
- modern architecture: sleek instead of
decoration, embracing the technology of what you can do with a
steel framed building
- modernism rejects tradition, finds new ways to
do things
- re-examine everything
mass production better fit the values of the Soviet Union
farm machinery was particularly needed, but farmers didn't know
how to take care of it
European critique of mass production and Fordism
Fiat "hand built
by robots"