4-9-18
Pong: Al Acorn and Nolan
Bushnell
why would Pong be a
success in competition with pinball games?
- easy to learn
- exciting because it was new
technology
- being able to control
something on TV
- direct competition rather than
just taking turns
business patterns:
- come out with new products as
quickly as possible
- get on the market quickly: get
known, see how people react, make money to build a factory
- economic booms and recessions
have a big impact
- these people were willing to
take a lot of career risks
- not of not worrying about following the rules or even
telling the truth going on
what is the culture here?
- laid back business
culture--hot tubs after hours, beer tap in the office
- young men behaving badly culture
but also nonconformist (hippie, anti-war)
- less room for women here than
in big companies like IBM
competitors quickly appeared
selling similar arcade games for a lower price
Atari was in financial trouble
the solution was a home version of Pong to hook up to your TV in
1975
key to this is the game could be on a single integrated circuit,
so harder to copy
Niels Reimers and genetic engineering
the scientific discovery was being able to clip out a section
from a strand of DNA and insert it elsewhere
this is the first possibility of genetically modified organisms
- can the process or the
resulting organisms be patented
- the culture in universities
was not about making money, scientists were more interested
in the public good and discovery
- fears about whether the
research was too risky
turning that into a patent was
difficult
the scientists were uncertain about patenting
was it even patentable?
different scientists and universities working together
meanwhile, fears of genetic engineering were developing
Asilomar conference in Feb. 1975
back to Mike Markkula:
Intel kept up, developing new kinds of chips, but the industry
was up and down
Markkula retired but did some consulting