Cronon 5
despite differences in property systems, Europeans and
Indians traded eagerly
for Europeans, there was a demand for fur, for fur coats and hats
for Indians it was a new model--
- they had some trade of fur for grain but was
mostly on a gift giving model
- some didn't understand the idea of trade (?)
- look more carefully at Verazzano
quote on page 83, bottom of page 7
- they had a different idea of luxury
- they were interested in things useful,
wearable, easy to transport
- but they quickly caught on
Furs were cheap from the Indians, if the Europeans could find
something they wanted
- metal tools and cooking pots
- woven fabrics
- goods were appreciated first for their exotic status, not
their usefulness
- wampum
was already used as a ritual exchange good and became a form
of money
- became a much wider spread prestige good
- the disruption of epidemics made room for the Indian's
economic system to re-orient
- hunting for prestige goods and the use of guns led to
overhunting of beaver, turkey, passenger pigeons, and deer
- they have an outside demand for furs.. and don't have
any concept of having to protect animal populations
- it was dangerous not to cooperate with the Europeans by
trade
- some indians blamed the animals for the diseases
- use of European technology
- they didn't have the experience with thinking long term
Impact of illness:
Even minor diseases such as chicken pox could cause high death
rates to people with no exposure
Smallpox was endemic in Europe
we know more about it just because it is easy to identify
- endemic=widespread and constantly present
- spreads from person to person but can be spread by dry
material for many months
- in Europe people usually got smallpox before they were 2,
10-15% died
- in somewhat more isolated areas outbreaks happened about
every 5 years (in later colonial America the density wasn't
high enough for smallpox to be endemic and there were
dangerous epidemics among the colonists)
- the Americas were isolated places where the disease was
not already present
- because of lack of immunity among the native people it
became an epidemic
- among natives not previously exposed, 1/3 to 1/2 died
- The death rate in many Indian communities was even higher
than that because of starvation or unhelpful disease treatment
traditions, such as sweat baths
- people living in isolated areas with few diseases may
have evolved weaker or less diverse immune systems
"The role of disease in
American conquest was threefold: firstly, it reduced the
fighting capability of the Aztec and Incan armies as they became
sick and died. Secondly, the deaths of their heads of political
leadership left power vacuums, and much of the attention of
vassal leaders was occupied with civil wars. The conquistadors
played factions against each other. Thirdly, the prevailing
beliefs of these cultures led them to believe that the European
forces were employing supernatural powers, and many military
leaders decided to either join the conquistadors, or flee,
rather than fight them. Consequently, resistance was weak,
disorganized, and usually nonexistent." (Graeme Kennedy)
What we think of as the indian civilization in North America is
actually what was left after diseases had done much harm
the exchange was one-sided
- the Europeans brought lots of dangerous diseases
- they didn't catch local diseases
- why weren't there local diseases? because there were very
few domestic animals and less crowding
at most only one disease imported from the Americas caused
significant problems in Europe
- even the theory that syphilis
came
from the Americas is now debated:
- people in Europe at the time believed that syphilis came
from the Americas
- there is good
evidence of syphilis in Europe before Columbus
- the trick is that the disease has changed over time,
sometimes becoming more serious, sometimes less
- a disease can mutate into something more dangerous
Europeans had had to learn to live with the diseases they
brought with them
the Americas had fewer diseases because of less crowded
conditions, fewer domestic animals, and isolation
- Europe was more crowded and so epidemic diseases became
endemic
- any area where people aren't crowded enough for diseases
to become endemic will have problems with epidemics
- Europeans had more diseases because they had more
domestic animals
- and they often shared the same building with their
animals
- diseases that evolved in different places came together
in Europe
- isolated places didn't see as many diseases
- Europeans had come to an ecological balance with their
diseases