Price 2
founding of state Audubon societies in the late 1890s to
save bird species
feathers and whole stuffed birds on hats were fashionable
- hunters supplied the industry by shooting
wild birds
The Audubon societies tried to persuade women not
to buy hat with feathers
- women were founders and most of the members of most of
these organizations--it was an acceptable way for women to get
involved in political issues
- women were beginning to organize as women to make a
difference in society
- they were not birdwatchers but were horrified by the
stories of killing large numbers of birds in rookeries (places
where they nested in large numbers)
- certain bird populations were devastated (eg. egrets)
- the passenger pigeon was used as an example
of the danger
Changing role of women
- colonial; women and men did different parts of producing
what a family needed
- industrial revolution moves men's work away from the home
and replaces some of the things women made with being a
consumer buying things
- separate spheres: men's world is public and competitive,
women's is domestic and moral
- women use these arguments to be involved in the public
sphere
Women's clubs were a way for middle class women to improve
their communities
- the idea that women had a separate sphere and were more
moral than men had grown in popularity through the 19th
century, and women used it to their advantage
- women's public moral reform started with temperance
societies trying to ban the sale of alcoholic beverages
- sometimes called municipal housekeeping
- hats with birds became a symbol of women as vain rather
than moral
- attack on extremes of vanity to argue that women should
be taken more seriously
- the argument was tricky because hats were both frivolous
and markers of social status
- Audubon societies made bird hats unfashionable
- argument for women as protectors of the young, bird
hunting causes suffering to young birds
How to protect birds?
- the initial association was that birds were beautiful
like women, which was initially used as an argument for birds
on hats
- that shifted to conserve the beauty of live birds
- the Audubon societies also argued that killing birds who
ate pests would harm agriculture
- birds were treated as human in nature stories, so seen as
something more than food to be harvested
- again lower class market hunters were blamed
- a new argument that destroying nature for the sake of
vanity was uncivilized (low class)
- the emphasis was on changing consumer behavior--business
men were just seen as following the dictates of the market
- Laws to protect birds on a state level
- Lacey Act prohibited sending birds killed in violation of
state law across state lines to be sold in another state