Rome 4
campaign to save open space: not just distant
wilderness areas but also local forests and farms
different kinds of nature that we might want to save;
- wilderness
- farmland
- swamps
- unbuilt land that trees grow up
on
spaces like marshes and steep hillsides that had
previously been left undeveloped were now being used for
housing developments as well
older neighborhoods often had parks but the new
subdivisions usually did not
Three arguments:
conservation
- is it bad policy to turn so much
prime farmland into housing developments?
- woodlands and swamps played a key
role in soaking up rain to prevent flooding
amenity (how your neighborhood looks)
- some of this came from a broader
attack on mass culture
- subdivisions needed open space to
make them more attractive and give a sense of place
outdoor recreation
- providing recreational areas
would help children grow up healthy
- children often played in
undeveloped land until it to was developed
William Whyte was a key advocate for open space, with
practical suggestions
- conservation easements
- changing zoning rules to allow cluster developments
other ideas
- land banks
- local government-owned open spaces and outdoor recreation
- but it was too expensive for local governments to buy
enough land to keep up with development
- the price of land went up because more and more people
wanted suburban houses not too far from the city
What worked at least in some areas:
- environmental arguments such as preserving wetlands
- arguments for more regulation to protect the land as a
resource
- when open space was saved for recreation then other kinds
of pollution became more obvious as a problem
- the 1960s were a time when population growth became a
concern
- wilderness organizations like the Sierra Club shifted
their concerns only slowly
- Audubon became a key organization working for open space
preservation
- arguments about environmental responsibility grew more
common
present
day version